Is photorealism in gaming really desirable?


Tim Sweeney, the guy who developed the Unreal Engine and founder of Epic Games, recently said that he is certain that in 10 years, video games will be photorealistic and the graphics will be indistinguishable from reality. I’m not sure this is completely a positive thing. Development costs are already huge for major titles, and I would think that the greater the level of detail, the greater the development cost. Plus, the gaming words are an escape from reality; I’m not sure that it will be as escapist if everything just looks real. What do you think - is photorealism a goal worth achieving?

Answer this Question


2 total
Vote Up (14)

Some games will probably use it, and some won't. There will always be a variety of gaming art and style, so I wouldn't worry too much about it. Game makers will go where the money is too, and I doubt everybody would want that kind of game.

Vote Up (12)

Graphics may not make the game, but they can aid in the immersive experience. You point out that maybe looking too real would destroy the suspension of disbelief (I paraphrase, obviously). Don’t forget, this could also mean a photorealistic fantastic world, where everything that is normal is turned upside down. It could be a little disturbing if some things look absolutely real. I might stop doing things like getting my money back from, ahem, “ladies of the evening” in GTA for example. But think how awesome racing games and sports games would be with photorealistic graphics. Very, I think.


Where I do agree with you is development costs, and the results of that. What you see already in game development is that companies tend to play it safe with their $100 million dollar development titles. 

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
For 14 years the Chinese government banned the manufacture or import of video game consoles. That ended last January and now Microsoft has beat the competition to market.
New technology may soon allow you to control your phone without touching or talking to it
If you buy a giant phone, pack it into skinny jeans, sit on it for 18 hours and find that it's bent, Apple's not to blame for the damage.
Inventors, investors, and entrepreneurs gathered for Wearable Wednesday in downtown San Francisco at the offices of Wearable World, an incubator for companies building tech that attaches to various parts of the body. Participants mingled, exchanged war stories, and demoed products at the demo booths lining the room.
Don’t trust that ficus! Rogue cell phone towers are popping up here, there and everywhere
Whether your hunting bears, burglars or ghosts, it's handy to be able to 'see' in infra-red.
Microsoft's new Miracast adapter wirelessly projects content to your TV like Google's Chromecast, but with more sophistication.
At least not until a few months after the device launches.
The good news: it's $39/month. The bad news: the price is only good for a year and there's a $99 activation fee.
Also, Sony says Morpheus is 85% of the way there.

White Papers & Webcasts

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Join us: