Why are people freaking out about people taking photos with Google Glass?

jhotz

Apparently a bunch of Congressmen just sent Google a set of questions to be answered about how they protect people's privacy vis a vis Google Glass. Good to know they are addressing serious issues in Washington. What is it about Glass that has so many people freaked out? Pretty much everyone carries around a camera if they have a smartphone, and it isn't as if you wouldn't notice someone wearing Glass around. Do you think these privacy concerns are legit, or is this just a good old fashioned, neo-luddite freak out?

Answer this Question

Answers

3 total
Christopher Nerney
Vote Up (16)

True, everyone has a camera-enabled smartphone these days, but the vast majority of these people don't walk around as if they're about to take a photo or video of you. The few people who actually do that are annoying and usually told to stop. I think if you're out in public, your expectations of privacy have to be reasonable. But in a work or meeting setting, many people may not feel comfortable with the possibility that they're being videotaped without their consent. And you can't tell if a Glass wearer is recording video.

 

Any time a new technology enables potential surreptitious recording or other forms of invading privacy, it's responsible to ask about implications regarding personal rights.

jimlynch
Vote Up (12)

Envision yourself peeing at a urinal. Then take note of the fellow next to you wearing Google Glass. He could be taking a photo of you at the urinal with a blink of his eye.

How do you feel now?

It'd be a lot more obvious if he tried to use a smartphone.

rousseau
Vote Up (10)

I think to a large degree it is people being uncomfortable with new technology, even though most of the technology in Glass is repackaged existing tech. Christopher makes a good point, though - currently if you are walking around being a creeper with a cell phone, it is pretty obvious. Of course, a serious creeper can just buy a dedicated camera that is far less obvious than Google Glass. Don't believe me? Just google "wearable spy camera" and see what you can get for a couple hundred dollars.

 

I also don't think most people are aware of the amount of time they are on camera, especially if they live in a large city. I lived in London, and there there are so many cameras that you are more likely than not on camera once you step out of your flat. It's a Brave New World, and the social norms that govern behavior on this are not really firmly established. With Google Glass being such a high profile item, it has become representative of the growing loss of a sense of some privacy when in public spaces.

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
For 14 years the Chinese government banned the manufacture or import of video game consoles. That ended last January and now Microsoft has beat the competition to market.
New technology may soon allow you to control your phone without touching or talking to it
If you buy a giant phone, pack it into skinny jeans, sit on it for 18 hours and find that it's bent, Apple's not to blame for the damage.
Inventors, investors, and entrepreneurs gathered for Wearable Wednesday in downtown San Francisco at the offices of Wearable World, an incubator for companies building tech that attaches to various parts of the body. Participants mingled, exchanged war stories, and demoed products at the demo booths lining the room.
Don’t trust that ficus! Rogue cell phone towers are popping up here, there and everywhere
Whether your hunting bears, burglars or ghosts, it's handy to be able to 'see' in infra-red.
Microsoft's new Miracast adapter wirelessly projects content to your TV like Google's Chromecast, but with more sophistication.
At least not until a few months after the device launches.
The good news: it's $39/month. The bad news: the price is only good for a year and there's a $99 activation fee.
Also, Sony says Morpheus is 85% of the way there.
Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

randomness