Even after NOTW phone hacking news most cell users don't use a PIN to lock their devices. How do you make sure employees do?

rcook12

We all keep lots of things on our smartphones that we probably would like to keep secure. Just ask Scarlet Johansson or any of the people who had their voicemail hacked by News of the World "journalists". It's one thing when it is something personal (even very, very personal), but it is far worse from my professional standpoint when it is corporate data. A recent survey from Confident Technologies (see http://www.informationweek.com/blog/mobility/231700155 ) suggests that 65% of smartphones have corporate data on their phones, while only 10% of those phones are actually provided by their employer. Ok, that's one thing, but when you combine it with the stat that less than 50% of users bother to password protect their smartphones, it becomes an area of concern. Beyond telling people to use a password on their smartphones (yeah, sure that will work), how can employees be actually convinced of how important these basic security steps are?

Topic: Security
Answer this Question

Answers

2 total
becker
Vote Up (13)

I think a big part of the problem is that many people just do what they want, no matter the corporate policy.  It is human nature to minimize appreciation of risk, with the implicit assumption being more or less that bad things happen to other people.  If you happen to live in a state without motorcycle helmet law, just look at the number of people that ride without any protective gear.  I've actually worked with a guy that crashed his bike and spent time in ICU who then made fun of me for wearing a helmet, asking me whether I was planning to crash and that if I was afraid of motorcycles maybe I shouldn't ride them.  The funny thing about that is I actually race sportbikes at the amateur level, while he just rides a cruiser around town, and I've walked away from a high speed get off.  Like I said, it's human nature to deny risk instead of managing them.  If ICU can't teach people about risk mitigation, it's a good bet that a corporate memo outlining security risks of smartphones is going to fall on deaf ears.

 

It might still be worth a shot to send out a memo reminding people of all the recent phone hacking scandals, and perhaps establishing a zero tolerance policy for employees leaving their smartphones unprotected if they are used for work related purposes.  Even if there is no practical way to enforce it, perhaps it would get a few more employees to take basic security measures.  

jimlynch
Vote Up (11)

Perhaps the best way is for the company to issue the smartphone. That way it could be sure that any phones in use will be set up properly for security. Failing that, I am not sure how a company would be able to properly monitor phones that were brought in by employees. I suppose they could require a security check on personal phones, but that could be intrusive.

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
A file-encrypting ransomware program called CryptoWall infected over 600,000 computer systems in the past six months and held 5 billion files hostage, earning its creators more than US$1 million, researchers found.
Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called for a "global compact" on surveillance and the use of collected data, saying the U.S. isn't the only country that does it and American technology companies are unfairly targeted for the government's actions.
Electric carmaker Tesla Motors wants security researchers to hack its vehicles. The Silicon Valley based high-tech carmaker will hire up to 30 full-time hackers whose job will be to find and close vulnerabilities in the sophisticated firmware that controls its cars.
Two recent vulnerabilities are examples of problems that could have been avoided if we had just applied the lessons already learned in similar contexts.
Windows XP users may now download a fourth service pack for the 13-year-old operating system, but it isn't coming from Microsoft.
The growing number of data breaches resulting in massive numbers of payment cards being stolen from retail stores and other businesses is occurring because they're failing to keep up with the Payment Card Industry's data security standard, according to the PCI Security Standards Council.
Email addresses and encrypted passwords of around 97,000 users who tested early builds of the Bugzilla bug tracking software were left exposed for three months following a server migration.
A U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation spokesman said Wednesday the agency is working with the Secret Service to determine the "scope" of reported cyberattacks against several financial institutions.
A payment card industry security consortium warned retailers on Wednesday of the urgency to secure their systems against "Backoff," a malicious software program that steals card numbers.
Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

randomness