Why is Anonymous nearly always portrayed as evil in mass market media?


First of all, I do not agree with everything that Anonymous does. That said, I'm not so sure that they should properly be seen as internet cowboys in black hats. What do you think, are they doing the general public a favor with their "hacktivism", or are they causing a lot more harm than good?

Topic: Security
Answer this Question


2 total
Vote Up (21)

If it bleeds, it leads when it comes to media. It's much more interesting and dramatic for the presstitutes to portray Anonymous as something sinister or diabolical. It gets more attention for readers and makes for a more interesting story.

It's always been that way and always will be. Anonymous is just one example, but there are many others. You can always count on the presstitutes to slant everything in a way that increases page views, circulation, ad revenue, etc.

Perhaps the best thing to do is just ignore them when they do this sort of thing. They want your attention so don't give it to them.

Vote Up (17)

I'm sure if you are one of the companies that Anonymous has targeted, you view their hats as very black indeed.  In some ways, I agree.  They force their social philosophy onto others through bully tactics, and at times call out opponents that aren't presenting a significant threat to society.  I would point to their targeting Scientologists as an example.  On the other hand, Anonymous does show the sometimes clueless consumer just how little protection some companies provide for their sensitive data.  Sony's Playstation network would be one example of a company's lax security putting the private financial data of their customers at risk.  Exposure of this lack of concern for customers through "hacktivism" serves a public good in my opinion, and results in more robust security measures than would otherwise be in place.

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
Corporate employees are taking a surprisingly lax approach towards security issues raised by the business use of personally owned mobile devices.
In the battle to keep your personal information private, it's not just hackers you have to worry about but lax security and stupidity.
Oracle is planning to release 115 security patches for vulnerabilities affecting a wide array of its products, including its flagship database, Java SE, Fusion Middleware and business applications.
Microsoft updated the Certificate Trust List in Windows to revoke trust for a certificate authority operated by the Indian government after it improperly issued at least 45 SSL certificates for domains owned by Google and Yahoo.
Cybercriminals are trying to create a new botnet based on what is likely a modification of Gameover Zeus, a sophisticated Trojan program whose command-and-control infrastructure was taken over by law enforcement agencies at the beginning of June.
Google is going to tour Europe with a band of external advisers this fall to discuss a landmark ruling by Europe's top court that gave people the right to have personal information excluded from search engine listings in Europe.
Apple users accessing Gmail on mobile devices could be at risk of having their data intercepted, a mobile security company said Thursday.
The source code for an impressively small but capable malware program that targets online bank accounts has been leaked, according to CSIS Security Group of Denmark.
Financial and business information was stolen from several shipping and logistics firms by sophisticated malware hiding in inventory scanners manufactured by a Chinese company.
In wake of psychological experiment, group challenges users to take a Facebook break and find out if it makes them happier.
Join us: