Need advice on hosted version of Microsoft Exchange. Any users out there?
We're at the point where we are facing an upgrade to Exchange. We're looking at the hosted version and wondering if anyone has experience using it and can share any insights into plusses/minuses, cost savings, migration issues, etc. Thanks! (Based on input from ITw readers.)
Answers
Not only is there a cost savings when moving to a hosted version of Microsoft Exchange, there’s also a good deal of benefit from making the regular maintenance of the Exchange server someone else’s responsibility/headache. Most small businesses can’t justify the cost of running their own Exchange server, and larger businesses should appreciate the redundancy and uptime that using a hosted, virtualized SaaS version would bring. Before migrating, you might want to make sure you get a backup of existing data including address books, which sometimes admins forget.
As for migrating to a competing technology, Aph3lio is correct in noting that there are other options – just none with which users have a familiarity. The shared calendars are often the thing that competitors are missing – because there are zillions of web-based email systems one could use.
- Share this answer
- Permalink
Respectfully, I disagree that user familiarity is an issue. This discussion is about a server-side application package. User familiarity has to do with the client (i.e. Outlook). Most of the options that I originally posted are "compatible" with Outlook.
And by the way, most options that I listed have a calendar system included as well.
There is no reason that you should only consider Microsoft for this solution. As educated technology consumers, it is our responsibility to call the giants out when they are selling us the same stuff that others are giving away. Perhaps you are too entrenched in the Microsoft trap to really consider a bold move like migrating away from Exchange, but if that is the case, then I am disappointed in ITworld. Consider the following software:
eGroupware
Group-Office
Open-Xchange
http://www.open-xchange.com/en/oxpedia
Scalix
Kolab
OGo - OpenGroupware
Zimbra
- Share this answer
- Permalink
My company has been using USA.NET for hosted Exchange for over four years now. We have both desktop and notebook users, as well as people using iPhones, Blackberries, and Windows Mobile devices with it. Their service is top-notch, and their rates are very competitive. I have no trouble recommending them as a good provider of hosted Exchange service.
- Share this answer
- Permalink
I have used Rackspace hosting for larger clients (>15 users) , and Mail2Web exchange hosting for smaller clients.
My main points are:
1. Exchange is hands-down the best email / calendar / workgroup product on the planet.
2. However, the cost of running/maintaining a small installation (which I define as less than 50 users) is not really cost-effective.
3. Enter hosted Exchange - you get the benefit minus the headaches.
Typically small clients need Exchange, but don't have any IT staff to maintain it. Additionally, your data is backed up offsite. I call that the "double-whammy" benefit.
John Becker
- Share this answer
- Permalink
Related Questions
Does anyone have experience actually buying and using Google Apps on an enterprise basis. Our company is considering making the move and...
Microsoft is reportedly developing a version of Word for the iPad. Does it make sense to bring productivity tools to a content-...
Where’s a good place to learn about ERP? Is my company better off with using a cloud-hosted version than running it on our own SQL...
Our company's newest web programmer says he prefers Microsoft Expression, a program I've never heard about before today. The people who...
We're looking to grow our small business from a few laptops and desktops, and haven't quite wrapped our heads around the best way to...
Ask a question
White Papers & Webcasts
White Paper
Turn your information into enterprise value
See more White Papers | Webcasts
I have used hosted exchange since version 2007. I have outsourced it for a couple of small companies asking for my help. The first company was Mailstreet.com, and they did well until they made every account pay for tech support even though they do not use the support. We never used their support and they refused to budge, so we ditched them. I currently use webhosting.net - and am very happy. They are running Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 and it works very well. I use it on an android phone with activesync and android pad. I also have users with iphones using it with activesync and it works great. We use standard OWA clients via browsers and apps that use OWA; as well as Outlook. I recommended them highly. They did a great job of migrating our data from mailstreet to the new server. It's worth it to outsource this stuff and take the extra pressure away from your IT staff so that they can concentrate on their work.