What are the main differences between VMware and Microsoft Hyper-V?


We are looking at both Hyper-V and VMware as a virtualization platform for my company, and I would like to know how much difference people have experienced between the two. Are there significant differences in ease of implementation, cost, scalability, security, etc.? Is there any compelling reason to choose one over the other?

Tags: HyperV, VMWare
Answer this Question


2 total
Vote Up (23)


Well, VMWare has been around longer and is arguably more fully developed.  It's number one for a reason - most of the bugs have had plenty of time to be worked out, people are familiar with it, and in my experience it is easier to find people that have experience with VMWare than Hyper-V.  On the other hand, Hyper-V is easier to learn, and has the advantage (in some situations) of being a Microsoft product, so if you happen to operate in a Windows only environment, it can save you a lot of money by allowing you to run virtual machines without requiring you to pay for additional server licensing.  


Here is a handy chart that breaks down the nuts and bolts of the two.  You might find it helpful. http://www.techrepublic.com/photos/marys-shoebox2/280735?seq=102


Vote Up (17)

Microsoft changes Hyper-V in each version, which creates a learning curve for IT staff with every new Windows relase.


VMWare has more third-party support, bringing all kinds of options for backups, vm syncing, and vm migration that aren't available natively or from Hyper-V.

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
VMware started patching its products against the critical Heartbleed flaw that puts encrypted communications at risk, and plans to have updates ready for all affected products by Saturday.
Running Windows XP in a virtual machine is a safe way to continue using it once support ends. Here's how to do just that.
VMware is about to release a new version of its Horizon VDI (virtual desktop infrastructure) software that will allow administrators to manage VDI and non-VDI deployments in a unified manner, by using multiple VMware technologies.
Greenpeace has marked Google, Apple, and Facebook as the cleanest datacentre operators for transparency, policy, efficiency, and advocacy in its most recent Clicking Clean report, published this month.
Citrix has partnered with Google to deliver business-critical Windows apps to Google Chromebooks, and has already pulled in major clients, such as Woolworths.
IBM has won a five-year contract to manage Coca Cola Amatil's (CCA) mission-critical SAP infrastructure on its private Cloud hosted in its Sydney datacenter.
The focus in SDNs and programmable networking is shifting to application policy, an area where vendors can instill their unique architectures and maintain customer dependency.
Hypervisors that virtualize the compute, networking and storage tiers provide a unique platform for enforcing security policies, VMware executives argued this week at Interop.
Amazon Web Services hopes to entice more Hadoop users to its Elastic MapReduce service with new virtual servers, one of which has 262GB of memory and 6.4TB of storage for big-data analytics.
Amazon Web Services' hosted virtual desktops have become generally available, priced from $35, but the company and its competitors have a lot of hurdles to overcome before this sort of technology is widely used by businesses.

White Papers & Webcasts

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Join us: