What are the main differences between VMware and Microsoft Hyper-V?


We are looking at both Hyper-V and VMware as a virtualization platform for my company, and I would like to know how much difference people have experienced between the two. Are there significant differences in ease of implementation, cost, scalability, security, etc.? Is there any compelling reason to choose one over the other?

Tags: HyperV, VMWare
Answer this Question


2 total
Vote Up (29)


Well, VMWare has been around longer and is arguably more fully developed.  It's number one for a reason - most of the bugs have had plenty of time to be worked out, people are familiar with it, and in my experience it is easier to find people that have experience with VMWare than Hyper-V.  On the other hand, Hyper-V is easier to learn, and has the advantage (in some situations) of being a Microsoft product, so if you happen to operate in a Windows only environment, it can save you a lot of money by allowing you to run virtual machines without requiring you to pay for additional server licensing.  


Here is a handy chart that breaks down the nuts and bolts of the two.  You might find it helpful. http://www.techrepublic.com/photos/marys-shoebox2/280735?seq=102


Vote Up (21)

Microsoft changes Hyper-V in each version, which creates a learning curve for IT staff with every new Windows relase.


VMWare has more third-party support, bringing all kinds of options for backups, vm syncing, and vm migration that aren't available natively or from Hyper-V.

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
As VMware sells its network virtualization software, it's finding that security is a big driver for adoption.
The enterprise and data center SDN market grew 192% in 2013 and is poised to reach $18 billion by 2018, according to Infonetics Research.
High-end NAS boxes tend to be expensive. QNAP's latest is the most capable in its price range, but it comes with a few caveats.
The signs of fall are beginning to appear: The evenings are a little cooler; leaves are beginning to turn; bulky people are tossing leather spheroids through the air; and VMWare and Parallels are releasing new versions of their Mac virtualization apps.
Mobile computing, OpenStack and containers win, NSX, vCloud Air details too thin at VMware show.
That software-defined networking (SDN) is a coming reality is starting to gain traction in IT security circles, with some vendors arguing it could lead to a level of interoperability in security largely missing at present.
There's nothing Amazon can have that others can't try to take away, as today's VMworld event sees the introduction of the VMware Workplace Suite -- a combined platform to deploy and manage applications and desktops from the cloud to laptops, smartphones, tablets, or whatever.
VMware has assembled a package that combines its desktop virtualization software with its tools for managing mobile devices, giving administrators a unified suite to manage all of their end-users' application requirements.
Some of the tech industry's biggest and brightest companies, including Google and IBM, have taken to running software in containers, a kind of hyper-compressed way to package up an app and get it running at scale without relying on virtual machines or the software licenses to run and manage them. At the same time, buzz has been building around the OpenStack open source cloud project for years, with customers beginning to talk about replacing at least part of their VMware cloud infrastructure with free-as-in-beer code.
Join us: