Tim Armstrong wants investors to overvalue AOL as much as those other loser companies, dammit!

Credit: Photo credit: REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

CEO would like some irrational exuberance thrown his stumbling company's way

What kind of unjust world do we live in where money-losing companies such as LinkedIn and Pandora can launch highly anticipated IPOs, while Internet dinosaur AOL can't attract the slightest amount of irrational investor interest?

(Also see: At AOL and HuffPost, it's all about quality)

An unfair world, if you ask AOL chief executive Tim Armstrong. From the Wall Street Journal:

In his opening remarks during a day of presentations to investors last week, the AOL Inc. chief executive pointed to the high-flying valuations of smaller technology companies that have recently gone public, some without profits, as a sign investors have "severely undervalued" AOL.

The man might have a point. Here are AOL's bona fides for the discerning irrational investor:

* Fiscal year 2010 earnings: -$782,500 million (-$7.34 EPS)

* Fiscal 2011 Q1 revenue: $551.4 million, down 17% from a year ago

* Fiscal 2011 Q1 earnings: $4.7 million (0.04 EPS), down 86% from $34.7 million (0.32) a year ago

* Fiscal 2011 total subscribers: 3.6 million, down 22% from a year ago

* Fiscal 2011 unique visitors to AOL Properties: 112 million, same as a year ago

Yet AOL's market cap is a piddly $2.1 billion, while LinkedIn (NYSE: LNKD) is worth $5.7 billion (and falling fast) and Pandora (NYSE: P) is worth $2.35 billion.

Granted, AOL hasn't shown it can lose money as consistently as LinkedIn, Pandora, or Demand Studios (NYSE: DMD), but under Armstrong's leadership, it's headed in the right direction.

So, c'mon investors! Clearly it's time to get irrational about AOL. They've earned it!

Top 10 Hot Internet of Things Startups
You Might Like
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies