Dissatisfaction in Convergence? LTE Beats WiMax

Verizon's 4G choice wins in battle for next generation wireless.

Looks like the picture of the future of cellular mobile/wireless communications is getting very slightly clearer.

After half a dozen years of expectation that WiMax would become the new high-bandwidth, long-distance wireless standard, the resignation of Sprint from the board of ClearWire -- a separate company half-owned by Sprint and hobbled with the job of rolling out WiMax as an alternative to Verizon's LTE -- and the failure of a deal with T-Mobile may kill WiMax entirely.

Meanwhile, Verizon -- praised by as having the least-poor network of the major carriers and damned for nearly everything else -- is pushing hardon the rollout of its CDMA-replacement/enhancement LTE network (though it's now getting some direct competition even in LTE).

That may make the choice of network protocols easier for corporations signing up for long-term mobile/wireless contracts, but it doesn't put IT in a good negotiating position. Verizon earned its reputation for enraging customers, charging all the traffic will bear for basic functions and a premium on top for anything else -- and killing or restricting functions in both hardware and software if it wants to offer its own versions for yet another premium.

As mobile/wireless becomes a bigger part of corporate IT, having just one major networking standard will make some things easier, but I don't expect anyone to enjoy it.

What’s wrong? The new clean desk test
View Comments
You Might Like
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies