AT&T takes down non-Y2K-compliant net

RELATED TOPICS

BASKING RIDGE, N.J. -- AT&T is quietly taking an old circuit-switched network out of commission because its Y2K fix for the net won't be ready in time.

The carrier is closing the network originally operated by ACC Holdings, a long-distance carrier AT&T obtained through a series of acquisitions. ACC primarily served residential and small business customers, and AT&T concedes that it never fully integrated the ACC switches and back-office systems into its own. ACC was purchased by alternative local carrier Teleport before Teleport was bought by AT&T last year.

In a filing at the Federal Communications Commission, AT&T revealed that it has to migrate ACC's 1,350 small business customers and 6,000 residential customers to the main AT&T telephone network by Dec. 31 because "certain legacy systems" are not Y2K-compliant.

The noncompliant pieces of the network are not switches but rather "all the operating systems around the billing platform," says Barbara Mottola, an AT&T program manager in charge of the migration, who says upgrading the systems would be too costly.

Although AT&T owns ACC, the smaller network still maintained its own primary interexchange carrier (PIC) code rather than AT&T's. AT&T's lawyers feared that if the company simply moved ACC customers to the main AT&T network without gaining individual permission from each of them, AT&T would technically violate the FCC's new antislamming rules meant to prevent unauthorized PIC code changes by unscrupulous carriers.

So AT&T filed for an antislamming rule waiver to make the migration faster, and the FCC granted the waiver last month. AT&T is notifying the affected customers of the change anyway.

Analysts say the fact that AT&T revealed it was taking down a noncompliant system, coupled with the fact that it also says it has no similar situations, is to the company's credit.

This story, "AT&T takes down non-Y2K-compliant net" was originally published by Network World.

RELATED TOPICS
Top 10 Hot Internet of Things Startups
View Comments
You Might Like
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies