A New VM

The Story So Far

The original kernel 2.4 Virtual Memory (VM) manager (known as the Rik

Van Riel VM, or RVR VM) suffered from serious problems. Long spinlocks

would block a CPU for relatively long periods of time on a

multiprocessor machine; in order to perform swapping, the required swap

file was at least as large as the system's RAM; and servers with 8GB of

RAM had to allocate at least 9GB of disk space to enable swapping. Up

until kernel 2.4.7, machines with minimal RAM would suffer from

sudden "swap storms" that would practically freeze the system. Due to

these problems and others, quite a few Linux shops have refused to

upgrade from kernel 2.2.19 to 2.4. A few weeks ago, Andrea Arcangeli

decided to write a new VM from scratch.

The New VM

Arcangeli's main goals were to fix known bugs, improve the overall VM

performance, and simplify it. The new VM (known as the AA VM) divides

physical pages into active and inactive pages. These pages are then

subdivided into dirty and clean pages (a dirty page is one whose

content has been modified). When the active dirty pages comprise 66% of

the total pages, the VM looks for the oldest ones and reclassifies them

as "inactive dirty". These are later moved to the swap when memory

becomes scarce. In addition to the noticeable performance improvement,

the swap under the AA VM is additional to the RAM, just like in 2.2

times.

The incorporation of the AA VM into kernel 2.4.10 onward triggered a

debate among the kernel community. While Linus Torvalds endorses it

wholeheartedly, Alan Cox's Linux tree adhered to the original VM.

Fortunately, Torvalds and Cox have finally agreed to adopt the AA VM in

future kernel releases.

The AA VM and You

The transition to the AA VM can affect you as a user in various ways

including performance tuning, system configuration, third-party

applications and libraries, clustering, and hardware compatibility. As

always, be cautious and prepare to deal with surprises when upgrading

to 2.4.10. Although the AA VM looks very promising, it probably has its

own bugs and glitches that will be discovered and fixed in future

kernel versions.

What’s wrong? The new clean desk test
You Might Like
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies