XML Namespaces

RELATED TOPICS

Chaos Theory tells us that the mere flapping of a butterfly's wings in

a South American rain forest can cause hurricanes on the other side of

the world. Believing this makes it hard not to be awestruck. After all,

a butterfly is a small and beautiful creature. How could something so

harmless looking be the root cause of significant and detrimental

events on a global scale?

The XML world has its own chaos theory-enabled butterfly known as

the "Namespaces in XML" W3C Recommendation from 1999. Weighing in at a

mere 15 pages, the namespaces Rec is certainly small, though opinions

differ on its beauty. Aesthetics aside, its ability to wreak havoc on a

global scale in the XML world is beyond doubt.

Ostensibly, the namespace Rec is just a simple way of allowing element

type names to be globally unique. Unfortunately, in so doing, it

introduces rules for defaulting namespaces that significantly

complicates any software it touches. XPath, SAX, DOM, XQuery, XSchema,

and XSLT -- all of these are caught up in the flapping of the namespace

Rec's wings, and it is not a pretty sight! I won't go into the details

here, but type any of the previous words into a search engine along

with "namespace" and "problem" and you will see what I mean.

Recently, the W3C introduced a draft of version 1.1 of the namespace

Rec. The changes suggested are minor but have caused the namespace

debate to erupt again on xml-dev (http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-

dev/200204/threads.html). Joe English, who is one of the most

knowledgeable people about markup technology on the planet, was moved

to post a plea for sanity that is well worth reading

(http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200204/msg00170.html).

When someone as knowledgeable as Joe English starts classifying

compliant namespace usage patterns into categories

called "neurotic", "borderline", and "psychotic", it behooves us to

take a step back and look at what is going on here! When the XML world

revisits its fundamentals (around 2008 I suspect as these things always

take a decade), namespaces will need to have their wings well and truly

clipped in order to redress some of the chaos and damage caused from a

decade of inconsiderate flapping.

My advice: Don't use namespaces at all if you can avoid it. If you

can't, then only put them on the root element. Oh, and don't lend money

to anyone who tries to tell you namespaces are simple.

RELATED TOPICS
Infographic: Starting salaries for computer science grads
View Comments
You Might Like
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies