Merrill Lynch hit with suit over Excite@Home research


Shortly after agreeing to a US$100 million settlement with the New York State Attorney General over charges that it issued misleading research, Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. was hit with a class-action lawsuit for allegedly maintaining positive ratings on stock of felled Internet service provider (ISP) Excite@Home Inc. when internal assessments of the company were far grimmer.

The class-action suit against Merrill, and its once vaunted Internet analyst Henry Blodget, was filed May 1 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and publically announced Friday by Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll PLLC, the Washington, D.C.-based law firm handling the case.

The suit charges Merrill with releasing positive research reports on the now-bankrupt ISP when private communications reveal that company analysts had contrary views of the stock. Blodget was a particularly high-profile Internet analyst at the firm, who earned his fame in the dot-com heyday by predicting that stock of Inc. would soar to $400 a share.

The class-action suit comes on the heels of the brokerage's settlement with the New York State Attorney General, which conducted a 10-month probe of the commingling of Merrill's research and investment banking units. The settlement is seen as paving the way for a series of reforms both within Merrill and the brokerage industry at large.

Shareholders who purchased Excite@Home stock from August 18, 1999 through Sept. 28, 2001 have until June 21 to join as a lead plaintiff in the suit. No one from Merrill Lynch was immediately available to comment on the case.

What’s wrong? The new clean desk test
View Comments
You Might Like
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies