The voice-over-IP push is premature


At NetWorld+Interop 2000 in Atlanta, voice over IP was everywhere. There was Voice Over IP Day, an impressive demonstration of voice-over-IP interoperability in the iLabs, and voice-over-IP vendors everywhere. Unfortunately, the voice-over-IP gurus are not so enthusiastic about quick absorption. At a postshow shindig, here's what I learned from the folks in the trenches.

In the toll bypass voice-over-IP area, the technology is ready even if the economics are not. Running voice over IP between two sites to avoid 4 cents per minute long-distance charges is a difficult proposition to cost-justify. You've spent $100,000 on a big voice-over-IP network, and you're already 2.5 million call minutes in the hole. Plus you've still got to build and pay for a QoS-based network to carry the call, using either quality of service to keep the voice running efficiently or quantity of service over-engineering. If the dollars work for you, then go ahead because voice-over-IP technology in the toll-bypass area works great.

Try to push voice over IP out to the edge in a company, to the phone on the desk, and you'll encounter four main obstacles:

The call managers and gatekeepers are not scaling to corporate levels. These are critical pieces. Try to present a serious call volume to existing gatekeepers, and you'll be looking at crash dumps and blue screens. Distributed call management helps somewhat, but when you put 5,000 or 10,000 phones on a corporate campus, the bottleneck is very real and the software is just not capable.

Voice over IP at the desk breaks Enhanced 911 location information. A voice-over-IP call comes from an IP address, not from a pair of copper wires carefully documented in a database. Where's that IP address? If you're lucky, you might be able to find the building. Any organization with thousands of phones will find the lack of integration with Enhanced 911 a showstopper.

Voice-over-IP quality at the edge just doesn't match what we're used to with a simple PBX. Quantization delays in the digital signal processors that convert analog to digital, along with inherent delays in IP packet building and processing, give a one-two punch to voice-over-IP quality. These phones have a noticeable, and annoying, delay. This doesn't signal a new life for ATM at the desk, but it does mean the voice-over-IP technology package needs to be fast to be acceptable.

There are the economic reasons. Voice-over-IP phones are dropping to the $400 to $500 range, but that's still substantially more than a PBX phone in the $100 to $200 range.

Does this mean voice over IP at the desk is dead? Absolutely not. The features voice-over-IP phones offer are outstanding, and corporate managers are running successful trials in smaller companies.

But don't budget for that 10,000-phone rollout until your vendor tells you how to solve these four problems.

This story, "The voice-over-IP push is premature" was originally published by Network World.

What’s wrong? The new clean desk test
View Comments
You Might Like
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies