An introduction to wireless spectrum regulation

Farpoint Group –

To begin with a really bad analogy, suppose you bought a very popular (and thus rather expensive) toy, and had lots of children who wanted to play with it. The first thing you'd do is set up some rules. For example, Billy gets it from 10:00 to 11:00, and then Susie gets it from 11:00 to 12:00, and so on. And there would be rules about what each child could do with the toy, and what penalties there might be for abusing the rules or the toy itself.

The regulation of the radio spectrum is a lot like that, with, of course, lots of lawyers and politicians thrown into the mix. The airwaves are economically (and often financially) expensive, because there's limited capacity, and they're thus a finite resource. Access to the spectrum via a radio-based device can improve productivity and lead to profits, so there's likely to be excessive demand. Without regulation, it's a safe bet that nobody would get much done as radio transmitters quickly polluted the spectrum and would make it essentially impossible for anyone to get their information through all the noise.

So, governmental regulatory bodies step in to set rules as to who can do what, when, and how with certain portions of the radio spectrum, often called bands. There are many different bands, and within bands different classes of applications. Some activities (like broadcasting and cellular) get exclusive access to their bands, while others (such as those used for wireless LANs) are shared with other applications. The regulators set such items as transmit power levels, how much spectrum a band will occupy, and many technical and even political parameters. The general trend in recent years has been to use an auction process to make spectrum for new applications (such as new cellular services) available to the highest bidder, with less regulation of specific technologies and other detail. However, large amounts of spectrum have been made available at no charge for limited-range applications, like cordless phones and wireless LANs. For data applications, more bandwidth means improved reliability and, of course, higher throughput. But, again, since everyone can always use more spectrum, the regulation process is often lengthy, political, and expensive.

What's more, each country sets its own rules for spectrum regulation. In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission is the regulator of civilian use of the spectrum, with most of the work being done by the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Spectrum for federal government activities is managed by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. The most influential organization in Europe is the European Telecommunications Standards Institute, and the European nations try to have similar regulations given their geographic proximity. But, and this is universally true around the world, spectrum regulation is complex and considered a national right, so nations are rarely in complete agreement with one another (on this and most other questions as well!).

But because radio waves can easily travel across national borders, it's important to have a forum for ironing out spectrum allocations and regulations that affect more than individual countries. The International Telecommunications Union, part of the United Nations, sponsors the World Radio Communication Conference every few years to work on emerging long-distance technologies and balancing the needs of growing economies against the more established. Access to spectrum is obviously critical to economic development and to competitiveness in a global economy.

Oddly, then, spectrum regulation isn't really about technology at all. It's really about politics, economics, and making far-reaching guesses about which services to devote spectrum to. Fortunately, the trend in recent years, on a global basis, has been to allocate more spectrum for those activities that provide greater capabilities in mobile voice and data communications - just the sort of services you and I need. And despite warnings of a "spectrum shortage", there's really no such problem on the horizon. Thanks to basic improvements in radio and antenna technology, and more efficient component and system architectures, there's plenty of spectrum to go around - and a lot more that we can do with it.

Copyright 2003 by Farpoint Group - All rights reserved.

What’s wrong? The new clean desk test
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies