But beware of tradeoffs when it comes to documentation, management tools and failover
One alternative to buying expensive storage-area networks or other hardware-based dedicated storage is to deploy open source storage software on existing server hardware. For this test, we evaluated three such open source storage products, GlusterFS 3.3, Ceph 0.72 and Apache Hadoop 2.2.0.
All three did a good job, but as you might expect, there is a tradeoff when it comes to using open source storage. This is a DIY project: the documentation might not be as comprehensive as you might like, installation can be tricky, GUI-based management tools might not be available and if anything goes wrong, you're pretty much on your own.
We liked GlusterFS for its hashing algorithm, which for the most part eliminates the bottleneck and single point of failure risk associated with products that use centralized management. However, GlusterFS, which is being developed by Red Hat, lacks GUI-based management tools.
To continue reading, register here to become an Insider. It's FREE to join.
This story, "Storage on a budget: GlusterFS shines in open source storage test" was originally published by Network World.
PayPal has fixed a serious vulnerability in its back-end management system that could have allowed...
Android is better than ever, but it's still not perfect. These are the things we wish were included in...
MIT researchers have found a way to transfer wireless data using a smartphone at a speed about three...
Going back to school? Here are some of the best laptop backpacks for every situation, whether you're...
Big data is best known for its volume, variety and velocity -- collectively referred to as the "3 Vs"...
One of the defendants agreed to forfeit $20.9 million in proceeds from the scam.
There's another OxygenOS update for the OnePlus 3, and you can finally check in on your AT&T account...