But beware of tradeoffs when it comes to documentation, management tools and failover
One alternative to buying expensive storage-area networks or other hardware-based dedicated storage is to deploy open source storage software on existing server hardware. For this test, we evaluated three such open source storage products, GlusterFS 3.3, Ceph 0.72 and Apache Hadoop 2.2.0.
All three did a good job, but as you might expect, there is a tradeoff when it comes to using open source storage. This is a DIY project: the documentation might not be as comprehensive as you might like, installation can be tricky, GUI-based management tools might not be available and if anything goes wrong, you're pretty much on your own.
We liked GlusterFS for its hashing algorithm, which for the most part eliminates the bottleneck and single point of failure risk associated with products that use centralized management. However, GlusterFS, which is being developed by Red Hat, lacks GUI-based management tools.
To continue reading, register here to become an Insider. It's FREE to join.
This story, "Storage on a budget: GlusterFS shines in open source storage test" was originally published by Network World.
PayPal has fixed a serious vulnerability in its back-end management system that could have allowed...
Niantic's earlier location-based game is an Android favorite, but it doesn't have the same accessible...
Last week's Windows 10 update for beta testers is almost certainly the final code for this year's big...
Amazon is promoting a few minor tech deals today, but the big sales are still a few days away.
Black Hat has disabled features of its mobile application because attackers could have logged in as...
PC makers HP, Lenovo and Dell have stopped selling PCs with home editions of Windows 7. However, they...
The most important ingredient in Windows 10's success in its first year was Microsoft's decision to...