Is Oracle going after Google because Ellison is buddies with Jobs?

At first, I thought this was just a silly rumor. But, after having several C-level executives tell me this theory, I began to seriously consider it.

By sjvn  6 comments

I can think of all kinds of reasons why Oracle is suing Google over its use of its Java IP (intellectual property) in Android. Making money from its Java patents strikes me and most experts as the most likely reason. But, I've also heard suggested, time after time, that the real reason is that Larry Ellison, Oracle's CEO is buddies with Steve Jobs, aka Mr. Apple and he wanted to help Apple fight Android.

Could that be the case? Here's the logic that supporters of this theory use. First, Google and Apple are competiting head-to-head in the smartphone space. The iPhone certainly has more users, but the Android phone family is quickly catching up.

Even before this product fight really started going though; Apple was feeling the heat from competiting with Google. That's one reason why Steve Jobs kicked Eric Schmidt, Google's CEO, off of Apple's board.

Then, of course, this year, Google started talking smack about Apple. At the Google I/O keynote, Vic Gundotra of Google said that the world needed a second major mobile phone operating system because, "If we did not act, we faced a draconian future where one man, one phone, one carrier was the future. That's a future we don't want." Oh, did I mention he did this in front of a 1984 poster?

What goes around comes around Apple.

Since then the war of words has been growing increasingly heated between the two giants of Silicon Valley. The New York Times reported that Jobs told an all-hands meeting that "We did not enter the search business. They entered the phone business. Make no mistake: Google wants to kill the iPhone. We won't let them."

Since then, the two companies have started playing the "You started it! No, you started it fight!" For example, in July, Larry Page, one of Google's leading lights, said that Jobs' suggestion that Google was responsible for the animosity between the two companies by choosing to compete with the iPhone with Android was "a little bit of rewriting history."

Apple and Google are now fighting hard in the smartphone marketplace. If the rumors are true, Google will soon be striking back at Apple in the tablet space with a Google OS tablet. That's fine for the marketplace, but Apple didn't have a way of attacking Google and Android in other arenas. Such, as, oh say, suing Google for abusing patents. Enter Oracle.

It's no secret that Ellison and Jobs are friends. In a 2001 interview, Ellison even said, "Steve Jobs is my best friend, and I love him dearly, and he's one of the most remarkable people on this planet. You watch him create Apple, then in one of the worst human-resources mistakes in the history of Silicon Valley -- the only thing worse was when the French fired Napoleon -- they fire Steve Jobs and Apple almost completely disintegrates. Then he comes back and he saves a company that was on life support."

As far as I know, Ellison and Jobs are still close friends. They're also both passionate about their businesses and life. So, would Ellison 'help' Jobs by throwing a possible patent roadblock into Google Android's way?

I don't think that could be the only reason. Making Oracle more profitable is Ellison's job number one. But, I'm also sure that when the lawyers and accountants laid out the pluses and minuses of taking Google on, Ellison also considered that helping his best friend out would be a good thing too.

6 comments

    Anonymous 1 year ago
    Google is supporting things like Django application development on the cloud, a model which puts Oracle out of business, if adopted widely. Oracle instead wants to puta crimp into Google any way it can. If this works, I would expect Oracle to come back with distributed database patents next, trying to break Google's ability to use their own distributed applications platform technology. This is just a trial balloon to see if Google can fight off a patent attack.
    Anonymous 1 year ago
    Steve Jobs kicked Eric Schmidt, Google's CEO, off of Apple's board.Umm, from the way I remember it, Google and Apple had an FTC/SEC problem when they were bidding over a company in competition and Schmidt was part of the Apple board. My understand is that hey resigned volutarily to avoid federal issues.
    Anonymous 1 year ago
    Part of me has a hard time believing that such petty motives and one-dimensional thinking could characterize men who have built and maintained multi-billion-dollar empires; history takes me to task on that point, though.
    Anonymous 1 year ago
    But, surely, Mr. Jobs is entitled to hold a monopoly just as is his rival, Mr. Gates??? Is there no fairness?
    Anonymous 1 year ago
    Believe me, Google has nothing close to the amount of patents that Apple has. People forget that Apple is a VERY LARGE and VERY OLD company. They've been around a long long time. Google is only interested in tracking you so they can get ad revenue. Nothing more.
    Anonymous 1 year ago
    The continued silence from official channels of Google (news release/SEC filing) suggests that Google is putting a lot of thought into their counter-attack. I expect this will be good.Would it not be sweet if they managed to engage Apple and Oracle with a devastating barrage? I expect they have some patent/contract issues with Oracle and I would like to see them enter the database business on clouds and all kinds of iron. I expect Google has some patent issues with Apple. Perhaps they can throw in some other illegalities and colluding to interfere with Google's business. I am pretty sure Oracle has cast a shadow on Google's plans so Google will be sure no stone is unturned to throw back at the both of them.With this much enmity I cannot see this confrontation being settled out of court. That would be too polite.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      BusinessWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Insiders Can Ruin Your Company. Take Action.

      Did you know that 80 percent of threats to an organization come from the inside? The threat from insiders is often overlooked in organizations worldwide. This white paper from NetIQ, discusses key technology solutions that help to prevent and detect insider threats.

      White Paper

      Ten Steps to an Enterprise Mobility Strategy

      Enterprise employees are more mobile, relishing the ability to work productively anywhere, at any time. They may use any means to get connected, often creating financial and security risks for your company. Discover how to get control of your enterprise mobility strategy and ensure mobile worker productivity with these ten steps.

      White Paper

      What You Need to Know About the Costs of Mobility

      Mobile workers want to get connected anywhere, at any time, often at any cost. Enterprise mobility is often a hidden "black" budget in your company. Ensure that your traveling employees are productive everywhere, even while you control cost and security, through an enterprise mobility strategy.

      White Paper

      The 2011 iPass Mobile Enterprise Report

      This industry survey covers trends, recommendations and a policy guide on managing Enterprise Mobility for IT management and CIOs. Get data on employee device liability, as well as smartphone/tablet penetration, budget control and provisioning. Find out how your organization compares, how to ensure mobile worker productivity, and control costs.

      White Paper

      Smarter Commerce is redefining value chain visibility

      Smarter Commerce is redefining the value chain in the age of the customer. It starts with putting the customer at the center of your operations - which of itself is not a new idea - however, truly operationalizing this strategy is not easy.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question