Is Oracle going after Google because Ellison is buddies with Jobs?

At first, I thought this was just a silly rumor. But, after having several C-level executives tell me this theory, I began to seriously consider it.

By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols  Add a new comment

I can think of all kinds of reasons why Oracle is suing Google over its use of its Java IP (intellectual property) in Android. Making money from its Java patents strikes me and most experts as the most likely reason. But, I've also heard suggested, time after time, that the real reason is that Larry Ellison, Oracle's CEO is buddies with Steve Jobs, aka Mr. Apple and he wanted to help Apple fight Android.

Could that be the case? Here's the logic that supporters of this theory use. First, Google and Apple are competiting head-to-head in the smartphone space. The iPhone certainly has more users, but the Android phone family is quickly catching up.

Even before this product fight really started going though; Apple was feeling the heat from competiting with Google. That's one reason why Steve Jobs kicked Eric Schmidt, Google's CEO, off of Apple's board.

Then, of course, this year, Google started talking smack about Apple. At the Google I/O keynote, Vic Gundotra of Google said that the world needed a second major mobile phone operating system because, "If we did not act, we faced a draconian future where one man, one phone, one carrier was the future. That's a future we don't want." Oh, did I mention he did this in front of a 1984 poster?

What goes around comes around Apple.

Since then the war of words has been growing increasingly heated between the two giants of Silicon Valley. The New York Times reported that Jobs told an all-hands meeting that "We did not enter the search business. They entered the phone business. Make no mistake: Google wants to kill the iPhone. We won't let them."

Since then, the two companies have started playing the "You started it! No, you started it fight!" For example, in July, Larry Page, one of Google's leading lights, said that Jobs' suggestion that Google was responsible for the animosity between the two companies by choosing to compete with the iPhone with Android was "a little bit of rewriting history."

Apple and Google are now fighting hard in the smartphone marketplace. If the rumors are true, Google will soon be striking back at Apple in the tablet space with a Google OS tablet. That's fine for the marketplace, but Apple didn't have a way of attacking Google and Android in other arenas. Such, as, oh say, suing Google for abusing patents. Enter Oracle.

It's no secret that Ellison and Jobs are friends. In a 2001 interview, Ellison even said, "Steve Jobs is my best friend, and I love him dearly, and he's one of the most remarkable people on this planet. You watch him create Apple, then in one of the worst human-resources mistakes in the history of Silicon Valley -- the only thing worse was when the French fired Napoleon -- they fire Steve Jobs and Apple almost completely disintegrates. Then he comes back and he saves a company that was on life support."

As far as I know, Ellison and Jobs are still close friends. They're also both passionate about their businesses and life. So, would Ellison 'help' Jobs by throwing a possible patent roadblock into Google Android's way?

I don't think that could be the only reason. Making Oracle more profitable is Ellison's job number one. But, I'm also sure that when the lawyers and accountants laid out the pluses and minuses of taking Google on, Ellison also considered that helping his best friend out would be a good thing too.

ITworld LIVE

BusinessWhite Papers & Webcasts

Webcast On Demand

Delivery Management -- Extending Lifecycle Management

Date: Wednesday, June 20, 2012, 1:00 PM EDT Siloed organizations continue doing the wrong things and doing things wrong, leading to increased costs, project delays, lower quality, and time-to-market delays. Providing a collaborative platform where the whole organization can prioritize, share and manage deliveries with more transparency can help the organizations make more informed decisions at all levels, and greatly improve communications and traceability between teams. Hear from application lifecycle management experts how to increase delivery efficiency and effectiveness with a new approach to Delivery Management.

Sponsor: IBM

White Paper

Gartner: Magic Quadrant for Midrange and High-End Modular Disk Arrays

This Magic Quadrant represents vendors that sell into the end-user market with branded midrange and high-end modular disk array storage systems that support block-access protocols. Despite rather gloomy macroeconomic conditions worldwide and ongoing geopolitical unrest in the Middle East, the midrange and high-end modular disk array storage market grew 8.2% from 3Q10 through 2Q11, compared with the same period the year before. Propelled by technological innovation and enhanced scalability, this continued growth in vendor revenue supports the observation that IT executives are willing to invest in modern midrange and high-end modular disk storage systems to improve operational efficiency, to support deployments of virtualized IT infrastructures, and to address the impact of unabated terabyte growth.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

White Paper

Seven Priorities for Integrated Network Management - How HP Intelligent Management Center Delivers an Enterprise-class Solution

This white paper describes the major requirements for network management solutions to help the organizations become more profitable, efficient and reliable.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

Webcast On Demand

Operational Analytics - Changing the Competitive Dynamics of the Business

Date/Time: June 5, 2012, 11:00 a.m., EDT, 4:00 p.m. BST / 3:00 p.m. UTC Please join us for this webcast, as Dr. Barry Devlin, Founder and Principal, 9sight Consulting, describes what operational analytics can do for your business and reviews an architectural approach that will enable you to make it a reality.

Sponsor: IBM

White Paper

The Total Economic Impact of the HP 3PAR Storage

Forrester Research provides an analysis of four HP 3PAR storage customer implementations to quantify the efficiency and cost savings achieved over legacy storage platforms. On average, HP 3PAR storage customers achieved a 10.4 month payback period with a 55 % ROI over a 3-year evaluation period and a significant reduction in CapEx and OpEx over that same period as a result of thin provisioning, maintenance costs avoided and labor productivity gains.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Ask a question

Ask a Question