Is eBay on the decline?

As Groupon's business takes off, online auction giant struggles to grow revenue

By Chris Nerney  Add a new comment

GigaOm has an intriguing column by Eric Jackson contrasting the recent fortunes of discount web site start-up Groupon and longtime online auction powerhouse eBay.

I've covered Groupon recently regarding its rejection of a $6 billion buyout offer from search giant Google. Started just 2 1/2 years ago, Groupon is expected to generate $2 billion in revenue this year -- four times previous estimates. It's on a huge roll.

(Also see: Groupon to Google: No sale)

But the stuff Jackson has to say about eBay in new to me, mostly because I don't follow the auction site so much any more. (And that's because I just don't use it as much as I used to.)

Jackson was a member of PayPal’s marketing team in the early years (1999 to 2003), serving as interim vice president following eBay’s acquisition of the company in 2002. So he has some sense of what makes -- or made -- eBay tick.

He notes that, despite the common perception of eBay "as a site populated by collectors and hobbyists, small businesses have always been the backbone of its sales." Hence eBay's urgent need for an electronic payment processing service such as PayPal.

However, while Groupon has successfully provided small businesses an effective (if not always lucrative) sales channel during rough economic times, eBay's Marketplaces revenue recently has stagnated, growing only 3 percent (to $1.4 billion from $1.365) in Q3 from a year ago.

Here's his money quote:

The reasons for eBay’s stagnation come down to leadership. During former CEO Meg Whitman’s tenure (1998-2008), the company’s culture became increasingly bureaucratic, and improvements to the site became few and far between. eBay hiked fees aggressively while doing little to improve its user experience. The company misjudged the threat posed by Google’s advertising network, which effectively decentralized ecommerce by making it viable for small businesses to sell directly from their websites. Also, as my former PayPal colleague Keith Rabois asserted, eBay started out as a fun, social ecommerce site, but it failed to grasp the advent of social networking. As sites like Facebook and YouTube offered consumers new venues for amusement, eBay failed to adapt and actually became less fun.

Jackson concludes by saying he hopes "eBay can roll back the clock and recapture some of that innovation it had a decade ago." Yeah, and I hope when I wake up tomorrow I'll be 25 again. But it's no more likely to happen. Once companies go corporate, there's usually no turning back.

All that being said, eBay shares (NASDAQ: EBAY) have gained 25 percent this year. However, if you go further back -- to, say, the beginning of 2006 -- you're looking at a 32 percent decline in share value. Not as bad as Yahoo (down 58 percent), but a lot worse than Microsoft, whose shares basically have tread water over the same time period.

Do you think Jackson's assessment of eBay is on the mark? Let me know with a comment below.

Chris Nerney writes about the business side of technology market strategies and trends, legal issues, leadership changes, mergers, venture capital, IPOs and technology stocks. Follow him on Twitter @ChrisNerney.

Follow Chris on Google+

Chris Nerney writes about the business side of technology market strategies and trends, legal issues, leadership changes, mergers, venture capital, IPOs and technology stocks.

ITworld LIVE

BusinessWhite Papers & Webcasts

Webcast On Demand

Delivery Management -- Extending Lifecycle Management

Date: Wednesday, June 20, 2012, 1:00 PM EDT Siloed organizations continue doing the wrong things and doing things wrong, leading to increased costs, project delays, lower quality, and time-to-market delays. Providing a collaborative platform where the whole organization can prioritize, share and manage deliveries with more transparency can help the organizations make more informed decisions at all levels, and greatly improve communications and traceability between teams. Hear from application lifecycle management experts how to increase delivery efficiency and effectiveness with a new approach to Delivery Management.

Sponsor: IBM

White Paper

Gartner: Magic Quadrant for Midrange and High-End Modular Disk Arrays

This Magic Quadrant represents vendors that sell into the end-user market with branded midrange and high-end modular disk array storage systems that support block-access protocols. Despite rather gloomy macroeconomic conditions worldwide and ongoing geopolitical unrest in the Middle East, the midrange and high-end modular disk array storage market grew 8.2% from 3Q10 through 2Q11, compared with the same period the year before. Propelled by technological innovation and enhanced scalability, this continued growth in vendor revenue supports the observation that IT executives are willing to invest in modern midrange and high-end modular disk storage systems to improve operational efficiency, to support deployments of virtualized IT infrastructures, and to address the impact of unabated terabyte growth.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

White Paper

Seven Priorities for Integrated Network Management - How HP Intelligent Management Center Delivers an Enterprise-class Solution

This white paper describes the major requirements for network management solutions to help the organizations become more profitable, efficient and reliable.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

Webcast On Demand

Operational Analytics - Changing the Competitive Dynamics of the Business

Date/Time: June 5, 2012, 11:00 a.m., EDT, 4:00 p.m. BST / 3:00 p.m. UTC Please join us for this webcast, as Dr. Barry Devlin, Founder and Principal, 9sight Consulting, describes what operational analytics can do for your business and reviews an architectural approach that will enable you to make it a reality.

Sponsor: IBM

White Paper

The Total Economic Impact of the HP 3PAR Storage

Forrester Research provides an analysis of four HP 3PAR storage customer implementations to quantify the efficiency and cost savings achieved over legacy storage platforms. On average, HP 3PAR storage customers achieved a 10.4 month payback period with a 55 % ROI over a 3-year evaluation period and a significant reduction in CapEx and OpEx over that same period as a result of thin provisioning, maintenance costs avoided and labor productivity gains.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Ask a question

Ask a Question