Goldman Sachs or Goldman Sulks?

Investment firm decides to teach SEC a lesson by excluding U.S. clients from Facebook deal

By Chris Nerney  Add a new comment

Goldman Sachs thinks securities regulations are for losers, wimps and socialists.

This, of course, makes the company no different than any other investment firm on Wall Street. After all, that excessive governmental oversight and scrutiny is bad for business -- "excessive" being defined as "any" -- is the official credo of the Masters of the Universe Capitalist Club.

(Also see: Facebook financials revealed! Well, some of them)

Which probably explains Goldman's decision to exclude its U.S. clients from the $1.5 billion private offering of shares in Facebook, as reported by the Wall Street Journal:

Goldman said the move came after officials at the New York securities firm "concluded the level of media attention [surrounding the Facebook offering] might not be consistent with the proper completion of a U.S. private placement under U.S. law."

I'm not sure Goldman's U.S. investors, many of whom were hand-delivered documents from Goldman less than two weeks ago soliciting their interest in Facebook, will understand the reasoning behind that somewhat cryptic explanation. Really, what's Goldman actually saying here? That the nosy Securities and Exchange Commission is going to be asking too many questions? Or worse, that the SEC might make Goldman comply with some meddlesome securities regulations?

Avoiding U.S. legal requirements could be one motivation. Another could be that Goldman is punishing all U.S. investors because some (or at least one) ignored the investment firm's repeated requests not to leak details of the Facebook offering to the blabbermouth media. But why punish all investors for the actions of a handful? That strikes me as petulant and emotional. Plus, well, the cat's already out of the bag.

Supposedly the offering has attracted $7 billion in orders from U.S. investors, far more than the amount being offered. The WSJ said a "person familiar with the offering" indicated that there's strong interest in the private Facebook shares in China alone, so Goldman likely will be able to scare up enough interest abroad. In other words, it really doesn't even need U.S. investors.

I think Goldman's motivations go far beyond the Facebook deal. This is about sending a message to Washington, the message being that Goldman is more than willing to take its business beyond U.S. shores as long as it must contend with what it considers to be burdensome securities guidelines. And what better way to get the attention of politicians than to have a bunch of angry, wealthy U.S. investors bombarding them with complaints that some picky SEC laws cost them an opportunity to take part in the latest investment of a lifetime?

Which is exactly what's going to happen. Cue the calls for the SEC and other government regulators to back off and let the Masters of the Universe work their magic.

Chris Nerney writes about the business side of technology market strategies and trends, legal issues, leadership changes, mergers, venture capital, IPOs and technology stocks. Follow him on Twitter @ChrisNerney.

Follow Chris on Google+

Chris Nerney writes about the business side of technology market strategies and trends, legal issues, leadership changes, mergers, venture capital, IPOs and technology stocks.

ITworld LIVE

BusinessWhite Papers & Webcasts

Webcast On Demand

Delivery Management -- Extending Lifecycle Management

Date: Wednesday, June 20, 2012, 1:00 PM EDT Siloed organizations continue doing the wrong things and doing things wrong, leading to increased costs, project delays, lower quality, and time-to-market delays. Providing a collaborative platform where the whole organization can prioritize, share and manage deliveries with more transparency can help the organizations make more informed decisions at all levels, and greatly improve communications and traceability between teams. Hear from application lifecycle management experts how to increase delivery efficiency and effectiveness with a new approach to Delivery Management.

Sponsor: IBM

White Paper

Gartner: Magic Quadrant for Midrange and High-End Modular Disk Arrays

This Magic Quadrant represents vendors that sell into the end-user market with branded midrange and high-end modular disk array storage systems that support block-access protocols. Despite rather gloomy macroeconomic conditions worldwide and ongoing geopolitical unrest in the Middle East, the midrange and high-end modular disk array storage market grew 8.2% from 3Q10 through 2Q11, compared with the same period the year before. Propelled by technological innovation and enhanced scalability, this continued growth in vendor revenue supports the observation that IT executives are willing to invest in modern midrange and high-end modular disk storage systems to improve operational efficiency, to support deployments of virtualized IT infrastructures, and to address the impact of unabated terabyte growth.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

White Paper

Seven Priorities for Integrated Network Management - How HP Intelligent Management Center Delivers an Enterprise-class Solution

This white paper describes the major requirements for network management solutions to help the organizations become more profitable, efficient and reliable.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

Webcast On Demand

Operational Analytics - Changing the Competitive Dynamics of the Business

Date/Time: June 5, 2012, 11:00 a.m., EDT, 4:00 p.m. BST / 3:00 p.m. UTC Please join us for this webcast, as Dr. Barry Devlin, Founder and Principal, 9sight Consulting, describes what operational analytics can do for your business and reviews an architectural approach that will enable you to make it a reality.

Sponsor: IBM

White Paper

The Total Economic Impact of the HP 3PAR Storage

Forrester Research provides an analysis of four HP 3PAR storage customer implementations to quantify the efficiency and cost savings achieved over legacy storage platforms. On average, HP 3PAR storage customers achieved a 10.4 month payback period with a 55 % ROI over a 3-year evaluation period and a significant reduction in CapEx and OpEx over that same period as a result of thin provisioning, maintenance costs avoided and labor productivity gains.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Ask a question

Ask a Question