The future is bleak without XP
In just under two weeks, Microsoft will discontinue Windows XP and make way for a new era in the world of operating systems. The days of Start bars will give way to wonky buttons and a refreshed design, stable operation will give way to frequent crashing, and XP will die at the hands of a misguided killer: Microsoft.
As much as Microsoft wants to make you believe that Vista isn't so bad and it's really the next logical successor to Windows XP, it's not. Vista is a bloated mess of code that features a ridiculous number of security prompts thanks to an overzealous User Access Control, frequent crashes due to its inherent instability, and a generally poor design thanks to Microsoft's insistence on making its operating system look like Mac OS X.
And to make matters worse, the operating system that everyone thought would be more secure than XP has proven to be just as bad. In fact, I would venture to say that now that XP is running Service Pack 3, it's even more secure than Vista.
Nice one, Microsoft.
But perhaps it's Service Pack 3 that makes my opinion so strong. If Microsoft never released it for Windows XP, Vista would have some attributes that may have made it more attractive after the June 30 deadline. But by adding Vista's enhanced security features to a product that works with every piece of hardware and software on the market, Service Pack 3 has solidified XP's viability and has quickly become a better choice at a much lower price.
But don't take my word for it. In the past few months alone, Dell, Lenovo, and others have come out in support of XP and last month, both Dell and Lenovo said that they would downgrade Windows Vista Business or Ultimate to XP Professional even after the June 30 deadline if customers asked for it.
If computer manufacturers are coming out in protest of Windows Vista, shouldn't that be enough for us to realize that it's probably not the best idea to discontinue XP? I certainly think so.
And to make matters worse, Microsoft is already starting its engines on Windows 7. Just a few weeks ago, Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer told those in attendance at the D Conference that Windows 7 would support hand gestures and they went so far as to say that the keyboard and mouse might be things of the past.
But if the two leaders of Microsoft are spending that much time waxing poetic about Vista's follow-up, what does that say about Vista itself? Wouldn't the company want to tell the world about the benefits of owning its latest OS and not undermine it by talking about its successor?
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
microsoft
Powered by TwitterOn Twitter now
microsoft
Brian Proffitt
OSI Board Addition May Bring Needed Change
Tom Henderson
Technology and Brand Addiction, a Twelve Step Program
pasmith
Another launch date slips; Que now coming in summer
Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal
sjvn
Windows XP's built-in Wi-Fi Security Hole
claird
Web developers: There's no excuse for device incompatibility
Mike Elgan
Report says Google will leave China. Hooray!
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Unix Tip: Sed & Awk -- Still friendly after all these years
Dan Tynan
Social media and privacy are not incompatible (it just seems that way)

Facebook's most wanted
Social networking has a dark and hilarious side of ill-conceived criminality. Here are some of Facebook's dimmest crooks (and smartest detectives). View slideshow.
See also:





I believe MS is not
I believe MS is not definitely making loses with Vista, infact most people will be forced to buy the more expensive vista business premium edition to be able to get a downgrade to XP.I definitely know from my university that they are buying Vista licences only, but then install XP on more than 90% of the PCs and notebooks and thus make use of the downgrade option. That not only lets M$ make many dollars, but also fakes the statistics of sold Vista licences, since they sell more, but acutally much less vista installations are running.
Regards
xB
gotta say ive been using
gotta say ive been using vista for about a month after it came out, so a long time.never had a problem, has never crashed, and looks nicer.
on home premium with the lowest spec and still is fast.
and after usin macs at college all im goin to say is 'program unexpectedly quit' every few mins!
Service pack 3 means
Service pack 3 means nothing. Business is notoriously slow in adopting a new version of windows, so the notion that business users will go to vista if they want the "enhanced security features" is wrong.These new features are Network Access Protection compatibility, a product key-less install option, a Kernel Mode Crypto Module and "Black hole" router detection.
Nothing special.