The future is bleak without XP

7 comments | 69I like it!
June 19, 2008, 01:26 PM —  ITworld — 

In just under two weeks, Microsoft will discontinue Windows XP and make way for a new era in the world of operating systems. The days of Start bars will give way to wonky buttons and a refreshed design, stable operation will give way to frequent crashing, and XP will die at the hands of a misguided killer: Microsoft.

As much as Microsoft wants to make you believe that Vista isn't so bad and it's really the next logical successor to Windows XP, it's not. Vista is a bloated mess of code that features a ridiculous number of security prompts thanks to an overzealous User Access Control, frequent crashes due to its inherent instability, and a generally poor design thanks to Microsoft's insistence on making its operating system look like Mac OS X.

And to make matters worse, the operating system that everyone thought would be more secure than XP has proven to be just as bad. In fact, I would venture to say that now that XP is running Service Pack 3, it's even more secure than Vista.

Nice one, Microsoft.

But perhaps it's Service Pack 3 that makes my opinion so strong. If Microsoft never released it for Windows XP, Vista would have some attributes that may have made it more attractive after the June 30 deadline. But by adding Vista's enhanced security features to a product that works with every piece of hardware and software on the market, Service Pack 3 has solidified XP's viability and has quickly become a better choice at a much lower price.

But don't take my word for it. In the past few months alone, Dell, Lenovo, and others have come out in support of XP and last month, both Dell and Lenovo said that they would downgrade Windows Vista Business or Ultimate to XP Professional even after the June 30 deadline if customers asked for it.

If computer manufacturers are coming out in protest of Windows Vista, shouldn't that be enough for us to realize that it's probably not the best idea to discontinue XP? I certainly think so.

And to make matters worse, Microsoft is already starting its engines on Windows 7. Just a few weeks ago, Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer told those in attendance at the D Conference that Windows 7 would support hand gestures and they went so far as to say that the keyboard and mouse might be things of the past.

But if the two leaders of Microsoft are spending that much time waxing poetic about Vista's follow-up, what does that say about Vista itself? Wouldn't the company want to tell the world about the benefits of owning its latest OS and not undermine it by talking about its successor?

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

microsoft

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Comments

I believe MS is not

I believe MS is not definitely making loses with Vista, infact most people will be forced to buy the more expensive vista business premium edition to be able to get a downgrade to XP.

I definitely know from my university that they are buying Vista licences only, but then install XP on more than 90% of the PCs and notebooks and thus make use of the downgrade option. That not only lets M$ make many dollars, but also fakes the statistics of sold Vista licences, since they sell more, but acutally much less vista installations are running.

Regards
xB
| reply

gotta say ive been using

gotta say ive been using vista for about a month after it came out, so a long time.

never had a problem, has never crashed, and looks nicer.

on home premium with the lowest spec and still is fast.

and after usin macs at college all im goin to say is 'program unexpectedly quit' every few mins!
| reply

Service pack 3 means

Service pack 3 means nothing. Business is notoriously slow in adopting a new version of windows, so the notion that business users will go to vista if they want the "enhanced security features" is wrong.
These new features are Network Access Protection compatibility, a product key-less install option, a Kernel Mode Crypto Module and "Black hole" router detection.
Nothing special.
| reply
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

James Gaskin
Learn How To Print Pages In Order with Ink Jet Printers

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace