The concept of virtualization needs to be clarified. On the one hand there is hardware virtualization. Hardware virtualization includes servers, desktops, storage, data centers, etcetera – the physical components of the network infrastructure. Virtualizing at the physical level is a tactical maneuver. It is not a competitive differentiator, nor does it provide a long term, sustainable competitive advantage. On the other hand there is process virtualization. Process virtualization is strategic to a company. Improved business processes offer companies a highly sustainable competitive advantage by allowing firms to improve quality and productivity, lowering costs and freeing up resources to focus on innovation and adding value. Business process virtualization (BPV) also unifies the focus of the firm, whether the focus is on creating profit, monitoring and fulfilling consumer needs, growing the business or all of these areas.
ÂÂ
Business process virtualization forces a firm to closely examine all of its business processes and how they inter-relate. BPV starts, then, with business process management (BPM). BPM provides the ability to gain visibility and control over information flows or transactions that span multiple applications and people. When a firm is hypersensitive to the inter-relationship of its core processes it becomes nearly impossible for any team to introduce an incompatible rogue process. When processes interact smoothly, there won’t be a need for subgroups to look around for a better way of handling the transaction.
ÂÂ
The point of process management applied to process virtualization is to streamline and standardize business processes, data, and IT infrastructure. For example, it is not unusual for companies to have different ways of handling customer orders depending on whether the order came in over the web, the phone, in the mail, in a store, or through a sales associate. This creates an inconsistent customer experience, potentially negatively affecting customer satisfaction and retention. From the business perspective, the inconsistency makes it difficult for the company to quickly gauge customer response to new items or sale pricing, making it nearly impossible to create a just-in-time inventory management system run by the company suppliers. Without process management, the drawbacks cascade from the customer experience through the company out to the supply chain.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.














waste of time
You managed to write the entire article without providing a definition of either "business process virtualization" or "virutal processes." And in the process, you've virtually wasted my time.What is BPV?
I can't gauge if BPV is a valuable strategy without a definition of what BPV is. This article merely reiterates the process of BPM, sprinkling in the virtualization buzzword here and there.I don't know what others
I don't know what others says about yr article. But seriously i found business process virutalization as an innovative concept and yr thoughts are too good. Life Insurance New Port Richey