Nvidia spent $43.6 million to replace faulty graphic chips
Graphics chip vendor Nvidia spent US$43.6 million during its last fiscal year to cover warranty and product replacement claims related to graphics chips that were manufactured and sold with a weak packaging material, the company said on Friday.
In July 2008, Nvidia took a one-time $196 million charge against its second-quarter earnings to cover additional warranty and replacement costs related to faulty graphics chips, which the company said included a "weak die/packaging material set." Nvidia's financial year ended on January 25.
Based on the $43.6 million spent so far, approximately 78 percent of the original amount set aside, or $152.4 million, remains available to cover costs related to this flaw.
The amount Nvidia has spent so far to replace or fix the flawed chips was detailed in explanatory notes contained in the company's annual report that detail changes in funds that are set aside to cover the expected costs of product warranties and returns, a requirement under U.S. accounting rules.
Besides the July 2008 provision for additional warranty and replacement costs, Nvidia also released a software update to computer makers that makes notebook fans run more often to reduce the thermal stress on the affected graphics chips.
Nvidia did not increase the amount it set aside to cover warranty costs for the flawed products in its annual report, suggesting executives believe the original $196 million provision will be sufficient to cover the problem. But Nvidia faces the possibility of future payouts. The company is now fighting lawsuits from investors and customers who are seeking punitive damages over the flawed chips and its handling of the issue.
IDG News Service
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
processors
Powered by Twitter
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













