Psystar's legal costs in Apple fight push it into bankruptcy

By Gregg Keizer, Computerworld |  Business, bankruptcy, Mac Add a new comment

Psystar, the Mac clone maker battling with Apple that filed for bankruptcy last week, owes the bulk of its outstanding debt to the California law firm that's represented it for almost a year, court documents show.

The Florida-based company, which filed for Chapter 11 protection May 21, owes Carr & Ferrell LLC more than $88,000, and a court-mandated mediator nearly $7,000, according to the bankruptcy petition.

Psystar hired Palo Alto, Calif.-based Carr & Ferrell, a firm noted for its intellectual property expertise, last July, after Apple sued the company over its practice of installing Mac OS X on generic Intel-powered computers.

The money Psystar owes its legal team amounts to 34% of the $259,000 listed as debts to its top 20 creditors. Only a $120,000 loan to the company made by Rudy Pedraza, Psystar's CEO and co-founder, accounts for a larger percentage of the debt. If Pedraza's loan is factored out of the equation -- reducing the "outside" debt to $139,000 -- Carr & Ferrell's bill represents a whopping 63% of the total money owed.

Colby Springer, the lead Carr & Ferrell attorney on the Psystar case, did not respond to questions today, including whether the firm would continue to represent the clone builder.

Psystar also owes $6,800 to the mediation firm Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS). Last October, a federal judge ordered both Psystar and Apple to enter what's called Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), a legal process that can include mediation, in an attempt to work out their differences.

Together, the JAMS and Carr & Ferrell debts amount to 37% of Psystar's total debt, and 68% of the money owned to outsiders.

Other creditors include the IRS -- Psystar owes nearly $12,000 in taxes -- and the DHL and FedEx delivery services ($12,700 and $8,000, respectively). But in its bankruptcy petition, Psystar didn't even mention its legal bills. Instead, it blamed the "weakened economy" and "the decrease in consumer spending" for its financial problems. It also said it was making less profit per sale because its suppliers, beset with their own money troubles, were unable to provide necessary parts, "[thus] forcing Debtor to pay higher prices for parts in order to fulfill customer orders in a timely manner."

The company promised it would come out of Chapter 11 intact. "Debtor plans on emerging from this Chapter 11 with a strong and effective plan to make an increasingly higher profit and still provide the consumer with the product they have grown to enjoy and trust," it said in a court filing. "Debtor plans to make payment of all debts and also, continue to provide support for its customers."

Psystar first made news in April 2008, when it starting selling Mac clones with Apple's Leopard operating system preinstalled. Apple began the legal wrangling when it accused Psystar of copyright and software licensing violations, and Psystar struck back with a countersuit that charged Apple with, among other things, antitrust violations. Those claims were tossed out by U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup last November.

The lawsuits are on hold for at least several months while the bankruptcy case works it way through the court. On Monday, Alsup ordered the stay, and scheduled a conference with both parties for Dec. 10, 2009.

Psystar's financial problems shouldn't be a surprise. Last year, noted intellectual property attorney Carole Handler, a partner at Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, said that Apple's lawsuit was aimed at killing the clone maker.

When Apple sued Psystar in July 2008, it demanded that the clone maker recall computers it sold with Mac OS X 10.5 preinstalled, a move that Handler said "would likely put Psystar out of business."

Psystar must provide the bankruptcy court with numerous documents by Friday, including recent tax returns and a current financial statement.

    Add a comment

    Post a comment using one of these accounts
    Or join now
    At least 6 characters

    Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
    Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
    The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

    ITworld LIVE

    BusinessWhite Papers & Webcasts

    White Paper

    Insiders Can Ruin Your Company. Take Action.

    Did you know that 80 percent of threats to an organization come from the inside? The threat from insiders is often overlooked in organizations worldwide. This white paper from NetIQ, discusses key technology solutions that help to prevent and detect insider threats.

    White Paper

    Ten Steps to an Enterprise Mobility Strategy

    Enterprise employees are more mobile, relishing the ability to work productively anywhere, at any time. They may use any means to get connected, often creating financial and security risks for your company. Discover how to get control of your enterprise mobility strategy and ensure mobile worker productivity with these ten steps.

    White Paper

    What You Need to Know About the Costs of Mobility

    Mobile workers want to get connected anywhere, at any time, often at any cost. Enterprise mobility is often a hidden "black" budget in your company. Ensure that your traveling employees are productive everywhere, even while you control cost and security, through an enterprise mobility strategy.

    White Paper

    The 2011 iPass Mobile Enterprise Report

    This industry survey covers trends, recommendations and a policy guide on managing Enterprise Mobility for IT management and CIOs. Get data on employee device liability, as well as smartphone/tablet penetration, budget control and provisioning. Find out how your organization compares, how to ensure mobile worker productivity, and control costs.

    White Paper

    Smarter Commerce is redefining value chain visibility

    Smarter Commerce is redefining the value chain in the age of the customer. It starts with putting the customer at the center of your operations - which of itself is not a new idea - however, truly operationalizing this strategy is not easy.

    See more White Papers | Webcasts

    Ask a question

    Ask a Question