DHS faces challenge in hiring 1,000 security experts

By Jaikumar Vijayan, Computerworld |  Career, dhs 1 comment

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security's effort to hire some 1,000 new cybersecurity experts could hit a wall because such skills are increasingly hard to find, according to security experts.

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano announced last week that the U.S. Offices of Personnel Management and Management and Budget has agreed to allow the agency hire up to 1,000 security experts over the next three years to ramp up its cybersecurity efforts.

Alan Paller, research director with the SANS Institute, a Bethesda, Md.-based computer training and certification organization, said DHS has a critical need for strong technicsal skills among its security professionals who handle tasks like intrusion analysis, malware reverse engineering, security auditing, secure code analysis, penetration testing and forensics.

"That's what DHS needs and is trying to hire," he said, adding that the agency faces strong competition for such skills from other government agencies like the National Security Agency along with private sector companies. The problem for all of the organizations, Paller said, is there aren't enough security professionals to meet the need. "DHS will be forced to hire weaker people and the cost of the very strong people will skyrocket," Paller predicted.

Clint Kreitner, president and CEO at the Center for Internet Security (CIS), added that DHS must also create "leadership stability and consistency" before it can hope to attract the right kind of talent. The agency needs to address issues that have contributed to a relatively high turnover rate among mid-level to senior cybersecurity professionals at the agency, Kreitner said.

The DHS' National Cyber Security Division, which oversees day-to-day cybersecurity efforts, has seen a "tremendous amount of turnover," Kreitner said. "It has been a revolving door." Many of the security professionals have gone on tothe private sector. "My guess is they don't feel like they are contributing as much as they would like to. If people felt they were being effective they would stay longer," he said.

President Barack Obama's continuing delay in appointing a White House cybersecurity coordinator has also been "a source of discouragement to many who are wondering whether the realty will match the rhetoric," on cybersecurity matters, Kreitner said. Obama announced the creation of the position in May.

John Pescatore, an analyst with Gartner Inc in Stamford, Conn., questioned whether the DHS, which employs some 200,000 workers overall, really needs 1,000 new security experts to meet its requirements. "For a typical private industry company of that size, you might see at most 200 information security staff --1,000 would be unheard of," he said.

Pescatore conceded that an agency with the DHS mission has more information security needs than the typical company, the plan to hire 1,000 new workers is "incredibly silly and hard to do. They don't need that many. [Even] if they did, they would be much better off training existing staff to become skilled in information security." he said.

The announcement about the DHS hiring plans come amid continuing questions about cybersecurity leadership . Critics have said that the NSA and the Department of Defense continue to exert more leadership on cybersecurity issues. The NSA increasing security leadership has led to increasing calls for the DHS to oversee the defense of government and commercial interests in cyber space.

1 comment

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    If President Obama is truly intent on gathering meaningful input and suggestions, and determined to make the most efficient use of existing infrastructures, rather than wastefully allowing "empire building" to duplicate efforts and dilute mandates, then he had BETTER be focusing less on letting DHS encompass Government and Commercial cyberspace security issues, and focus more on snagging existing workgroups who already have some clue. "Incredibly silly" in this case equates too well with "building from scratch". Don't do it. UNLESS and EXCEPT organizational memes can be "left at the door" and "the way we've ALWAYS done it" can be ignored except as a horrible object lesson, some existing inefficiencies will have to be tolerated. We need to see a publicity campaign, similar to the recent USA networks 'buzz' -- on the order of "Paranoics wanted."

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question