Azure set to collide with Microsoft channel partners, again

Conflict has been real since '08, but growth is making it irrelevant

By Kevin Fogarty  1 comment

Microsoft is trying to avoid admitting that enhancing Azure to make it more like Amazon's EC2 will inevitably bring it into competition with companies in its own reseller channel -- as many channel companies warned in 2008 when Microsoft first started talking about selling Software + Services.

[ See also: Microsoft vs. Amazon Clouds: 5 Key Differences ]

Microsoft announced both Azure and the Business Productivity Online Suite (BPOS) (the name sings, doesn't it?) at the PDC in 2008, to, at best, muted response. Some channel partners liked the idea because it gave them something to sell they didn't have to build; others thought they'd end up competing directly against Microsoft rather than being able to sell it.

Gartner analyst Neil MacDonald told Network World that adding the ability to launch and control individual instances of Windows Server as virtual machines makes Azure more competitive with Rackspace and other Microsoft-centric hosters.

Rackspace has actually already slid out from under the potential for channel conflict, according to Lew Moorman, president of loud at Rackspace, which started out as a PAAS just like Azure, but expanded sooner to give customers direct access to the VMs, storage, I/O and other data-center elements.

Rackspace is a Microsoft partner, but figures releasing its proprietary, basic cloud-management software as the open-source OpenStack will eliminate minor conflicts like that one by accelerating the commoditization of basic cloud functions, Moorman said.

With the basics covered -- APIs, data access, load balancing -- service providers will compete on extra services they can provide on top of those basic functions, allowing the lowest-common-denominator stuff to act as a de facto standard operating platform.

That won't help Microsoft and its channel problem, but it's focused more on competing with Amazon's EC2, the other of the two Big Cloud Vendors whose name everyone knows.

There are a lot more than just two cloud vendors, though, and the ranks of companies offering IAAS, PAAS and SAAS in various combinations is growing so quickly it won't be long before the obsessive competition between Amazon and Azure will be as irrelevant to most people as the result of last year's Harvard/Yale game.

If you're an Eli in Harvard Yard, you probably know who won and why you should care. If you're almost anyone else, you have other places to go for that particular kind of entertainment and almost all of them are better choices than watching guys with 4.0 GPAs and questionable athletic skills run into each other for two hours.

Kevin Fogarty writes about enterprise IT for ITworld. Follow him on Twitter @KevinFogarty.

1 comment

    Anonymous 1 year ago
    The Cloud is inevitably going into demand, since service-orientation is inevitable to those who apply technology to anything... whether it's a channel partner or a customer... so I wouldn't be surprised if tech innovators start focusing on bringing the technology to market instead of choke holding each other over deals on paper. No wonder paper so often represents obsolescence and waste in the tech industry. Just follow the paper trail, burn it... recycle the paper, then build a cardboard box and print CLOUD on it. Make sure you patent the phrasiology. Don't let anyone see inside the box until they sign an NDA. Sure, you can own The Cloud. That will happen.... on your windows BOX.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question