There's a lot of buzz this past few days about Microsoft's latest announcement about Windows 7. On Tuesday, the company issued an announcement that there would be six SKUs of Windows 7 on the market. For my two cents, I think Microsoft should take a lesson from the fast food industry: Think "small, medium, or large." Or more accurately, use the Starbucks model of "Tall, Grande and Venti", since there's really nothing "small" about Windows, is there?
From a purely marketing perspective, three options is perfect--gives the consumer choice, but not too much choice. And regardless of the wisdom and logic behind the six variations, there has been plenty of negative comments on the blogosphere about the potential for confusion. After all, it's not Linux. How many hundreds of Linux distributions are there? That's why Linux will never be mainstream. Nobody knows which distribution to use. That, and the perception of being only for power users and the lack of marketing. Seriously, a couple good penguin-themed Super Bowl ads would be a game-changer.
To their credit though, Microsoft is focusing on promoting two editions as the main offerings: Windows 7 Home Premium and Windows 7 Professional, and these two will encompass the majority of users. Microsoft will also be offering a Starter Edition, Home Basic, Enterprise, and Ultimate version. The "Home Basic" is targeted at emerging markets, so we won't be seeing much of that in the States; rather, the intent is to make sure that third world users have the opportunity to use Windows as well. (If you've ever been to a bazaar in Southeast Asia though, you know they already do, although you typically buy it from a shady dealer who has copies under the counter for five bucks each.) The Starter Edition, which will be available only pre-installed by an OEM on specific types of hardware, will presumably meet the need for users who still run lower-end, less expensive hardware. The Ultimate version is the Microsoft equivalent of "Would you like to Supersize that?" and has all the extra goodies that most of us don't need or don't care about, but are essential to a small group of power users.
So long as Redmond stays focused on the two primary offerings, Windows 7 has a good shot at getting past the negative perceptions about Vista, and back into the good graces of Windows users everywhere.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.














A variety of distributions are a very good thing.
Smell the Coffee, distributions are not operating systems. They are extremely helpful advances in how software is packaged and deployed. In the Microsoft world, picture being able to easily put your favorite operating system (maybe you like XP, service pack 3) on a cd (sorry DVD since windows is bloated), add your favorite office applications (Visio, Word, Excel), change the background to your favorite screen saver, bundle some cool content (you're home recorded .mp3s), package all of this to auto install, and give the cd to all of your friends and co-workers. They hit install once and everything is configured and ready to go. Awesome!!! Too bad this is not LEGAL in the Microsoft world because otherwise you would UNDERSTAND the value of distributions.Yeah, fool yourself.
Just because you are a linux fan, I see that you have to reconcile yourself to the confusing situation of having so many distributions by saying its a good thing. let me tell you, its not.Linux plainly is stupid. And I've seen on some of those 'support forums' the replies to queries are usually like this - 'Change your distro', 'Ubuntu is childish'
Better face the situation than run away from it.
Choice != Confusion
Ok, there are hundreds of distros, but how many stands out? 5 ?Fedora
Ubuntu (Debian if you want to go further)
Mandriva
OpenSuse
That's it, the rest doesnt need to be known for the average user. If you are a geek, you can look around and make other choices, if not, that list would do it. My personal opinion is that Fedora is kinda crap for the average Joe, so that leaves 3 of them. How is that confusing ? If you dont know, just pick the most popular -> Ubuntu.
PS : Linux is not stupid, Windows is. I am an ex-windows user and I used to hate Linux (it was 10 years ago).