Top tech execs call on Obama to consider open-source

By Dan Blacharski  2 comments

A group of prominent open source industry executives have issued an open letter to President Obama highlighting the critical role open-source software could play in the government sector.

There is a lot of talk in Washington about spending money to stimulate the economy, but very little talk about saving money and creating efficient systems. That's not to say that traditional, "closed" software packages don't have their place; there are many, many fine products that are licensed on that basis. However, as any VAR or SI that serves a government agency knows, government is unlike any other customer. There are very specific requirements that don't apply to the private sector, and in many cases, high levels of customization are necessary. Open-source based solutions make a lot of sense here, for this reason alone.

An open-source project doesn't necessarily cost less than a traditional project based on closed-source software, at least at first. But two things come into play that would serve to make government a lot more efficient. The first is that ongoing customization would become a lot easier, and the second is that such a model would promote re-use between government agencies--and that's where the big savings and greater efficiency comes in. Suppose for example, that one state agency creates an open-source solution to meet a specific need. Why should the other 49 states then have to re-invent the wheel? Rather, it makes more sense to take the original open-source code, modify it for each state's particular needs, and enjoy the economies of scale.

In the letter to the President, the executives say, "open-source software brings transparency to software development. there are no 'black boxes' in open-source software and therefore no need to guess what is going on 'behind the scenes.' Ultimately, this means a better product for everyone, because there is visibility at every level of the application, from the user interface to the data implementation. Furthermore, open-source sotware provides for platform independence, which makes quick deployments that benefit our citizens much easier and realistic."

The letter calls open-source software "the tip of the iceberg" in changing how government works, and encourages the President "to find ways for states and agencies to collaborate together on solutions that ultimately are better than the sum of all the individual efforts combined and at much lower cost to each participant. Open-source software encourages this type of collaboration by making the results of previous successful efforts available to others with similar goals and needs."

2 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    体重が気になりだしたので、マイクロダイエットを始めた。 旅行が好きな私は初めてのハワイに海外旅行に行く予です。 結婚を焦りはじめたので結婚相談所に登録に行きます。 就職活動する上で資格が必要と思い国家資格を合格するために専門学校に行きます。 ETCを車に取り付けが終わったのでETCカードを申し込みました。結婚相手を真剣に探すためアラサー お見合いパーティーに参加した。
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    A government preference or special consideration for open source software would be unnecessary and unwise. Government IT buyers will naturally “consider the source of an application solution (open or closed) as part of the government's technology acquisition process.” It doesn’t need to be mandated. Seeking special status for open source software is no different than seeking an “earmark.” Open source has not been proven to provide greater cost savings, security or interoperability than commercial software. It may be perfect for some applications and less so for others. The IT buyer should be free to make the choice -- open source, properietary, or a mix of the two -- that works best for the organization. Also, government purchasing rules have a huge impact on the technology marketplace. Any limitations on government purchasers will also affect the choices that are available to everyday consumers. Finally, the US Government asks governments around the world to adhere to the principle of technology neutrality, not mandating one technology by law or regulation. Abandonment of tech neutrality in USG purchasing would open the door to discrimination against US-based companies and workers. Instead of picking winners and losers, government should focus on establishing performance goals and allowing companies to compete to meet those goals. A goals-based program will maintain flexibility in a world where technological change is inevitable and desirable.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question