Microsoft's 'open' cloud addition doesn't mean what you think

'Open' to apps and content moving to Azure, not back again


Microsoft's answer is a little less ambitious, too.

Rather than offering the base code for its Azure PaaS cloud as an open-source standalone offering, it offered more granular contracts and pricing for Azure in an effort to draw in open-source developers who might otherwise run their apps on Amazon's EC2 or Google.

Its "open" focus was on making it easier for content partners to get stuff up on Azure, not make the code or platform itself more open.

It did issue a new version of the Azure SDK that makes it easier to port apps through IIS to Azure; it also issued an early beta for a Traffic Manager that acts as a performance manager for apps running on Azure.

And it promoted Orchard 1.1, the open-source content management system from the OuterCurve Foundation, whose code works with Azure's Microsoft-centric cloud because Microsoft helped found and promote it.

Join us:






Spotlight on ...
Online Training

    Upgrade your skills and earn higher pay

    Readers to share their best tips for maximizing training dollars and getting the most out self-directed learning. Here’s what they said.


    Learn more

Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Ask a Question