Getting your friends and family to try Linux just got a lot easier. With the 3rd edition of Ubuntu for Non-Geeks and a desktop with spiffy visual effects, they might become easy converts!
This book that sounds well-targeted to the many non-geek adopters of Ubuntu. The review contains one minor error, yielding (I'm afraid) a rather long explanation. Please bear with me.
Ubuntu is release twice yearly, usually in April and October. The version number is the year (less two thousand) to the left of the dot, and the two-digit month to the right.
Two word alliterative animal-based code names have identified the more recent versions prior to their release, usually with successive letters for each release.
Thus, 5.10 was "Breezy Badger", 6.06 (a rare June release and skip-letter) was "Dapper Drake", 6.10 was "Edgy Eft", 7.04 was "Feisty Fawn", 7.10 was "Gutsy Gibbon", 8.04 was "Hardy Heron", and 8.10 will be "Intrepid Ibex".
Thus (to my point), the code name for 9.04 could be expected to start with the letter "J", not (as the review states) the letter "I" (already used for 8.10).
I'm partial to "Jazzy Jaguar", personally. :-)
That minor mistake aside, however, I very much appreciate the clear and concise review. Thanks!
by ricegf (not verified) on 8/16/08 at 7:15 am |reply
"Linux systems do not
"Linux systems do not require users who can write their own utilities or build their own computers from spare parts. On the contrary, Linux systems have as appealing desktops and friendly applications as any Windows box, as easy to use an interface and at least as much visual appeal."
Not true at all. I use Ubuntu 8.04 Desktop on my laptop and I have a couple servers running 8.04 Server. I love Ubuntu and I think it's a wonderful Linux distro, but I would NEVER recommend it to a "non-geek". I would argue that Ubuntu does, in fact, require you to be the kind of person that can write scripts and build your own computer. While it's incredibly easy to install Ubuntu, day-to-day use is much more difficult. Installing a program in Ubuntu, for instance, is more of a pain than Windows. The user cannot simply download a Ubuntu binary from the products web page. They could download a source installer and compile it themselves, but this is inadvisable on a Debian-based distro, and especially inadvisable for a n00b. They have to hope that it's in the Ubuntu repositories (and they have the right repositories enabled), open the package manager, and search through thousands of packages for the right one. Sometimes the packages have weird misleading names.
Hopefully Ubuntu recognized all of your hardware on install, and it's all working correctly. If it's not, prepare to spend hours on-end trolling forums and trying several different patches and work-arounds. There's no guarantee that you will ever get that on-board Realtek sound card working properly.
On several different occasions, largely due to the aforementioned hardware problems, I have had routine package updates make Ubuntu unbootable, in which case you better hope that you can undo the damage, or have an extremely recent backup available.
As far as the interface goes, it's not bad. Windows users will be pretty much at home with the Kubuntu version with the KDE desktop environment. KDE4 is especially good - mixing some nice-looking window compositing effects with function and ease of use. Gnome is good too, but not as pretty or easy to use, IMO.
With each release, Ubuntu gets more stable and easier to use. I would definitely recommend Ubuntu to an "adventurous" geek who doesn't mind hammering out some frustrating problems now and again, but I wouldn't ever suggest it to someone with little computer knowledge and/or impatient people.
by X3HaloEd (not verified) on 8/22/08 at 11:34 am |reply
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Surviving Windows is easier than you think… MKS offers the power of an integrated all-in-one environment and provides you with the Power of UNIX on Windows Learn More
Brought to you by:
Free books
We have 5 copies of these two new books to give to some lucky readers. The deadline for entries is November 30, 2009.
AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.
In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases
built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC
technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability
and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.
On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.
jfruh
pasmith
Esther Schindler
mikelgan
David Strom
sjvn
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Excellent book review,
Excellent book review, thanks.This book that sounds well-targeted to the many non-geek adopters of Ubuntu. The review contains one minor error, yielding (I'm afraid) a rather long explanation. Please bear with me.
Ubuntu is release twice yearly, usually in April and October. The version number is the year (less two thousand) to the left of the dot, and the two-digit month to the right.
Two word alliterative animal-based code names have identified the more recent versions prior to their release, usually with successive letters for each release.
Thus, 5.10 was "Breezy Badger", 6.06 (a rare June release and skip-letter) was "Dapper Drake", 6.10 was "Edgy Eft", 7.04 was "Feisty Fawn", 7.10 was "Gutsy Gibbon", 8.04 was "Hardy Heron", and 8.10 will be "Intrepid Ibex".
Thus (to my point), the code name for 9.04 could be expected to start with the letter "J", not (as the review states) the letter "I" (already used for 8.10).
I'm partial to "Jazzy Jaguar", personally. :-)
That minor mistake aside, however, I very much appreciate the clear and concise review. Thanks!
"Linux systems do not
"Linux systems do not require users who can write their own utilities or build their own computers from spare parts. On the contrary, Linux systems have as appealing desktops and friendly applications as any Windows box, as easy to use an interface and at least as much visual appeal."Not true at all. I use Ubuntu 8.04 Desktop on my laptop and I have a couple servers running 8.04 Server. I love Ubuntu and I think it's a wonderful Linux distro, but I would NEVER recommend it to a "non-geek". I would argue that Ubuntu does, in fact, require you to be the kind of person that can write scripts and build your own computer. While it's incredibly easy to install Ubuntu, day-to-day use is much more difficult. Installing a program in Ubuntu, for instance, is more of a pain than Windows. The user cannot simply download a Ubuntu binary from the products web page. They could download a source installer and compile it themselves, but this is inadvisable on a Debian-based distro, and especially inadvisable for a n00b. They have to hope that it's in the Ubuntu repositories (and they have the right repositories enabled), open the package manager, and search through thousands of packages for the right one. Sometimes the packages have weird misleading names.
Hopefully Ubuntu recognized all of your hardware on install, and it's all working correctly. If it's not, prepare to spend hours on-end trolling forums and trying several different patches and work-arounds. There's no guarantee that you will ever get that on-board Realtek sound card working properly.
On several different occasions, largely due to the aforementioned hardware problems, I have had routine package updates make Ubuntu unbootable, in which case you better hope that you can undo the damage, or have an extremely recent backup available.
As far as the interface goes, it's not bad. Windows users will be pretty much at home with the Kubuntu version with the KDE desktop environment. KDE4 is especially good - mixing some nice-looking window compositing effects with function and ease of use. Gnome is good too, but not as pretty or easy to use, IMO.
With each release, Ubuntu gets more stable and easier to use. I would definitely recommend Ubuntu to an "adventurous" geek who doesn't mind hammering out some frustrating problems now and again, but I wouldn't ever suggest it to someone with little computer knowledge and/or impatient people.
I have just downloaded the
I have just downloaded the new Ubuntu 8 desktop after struggling to grasp the concept of Fedora for a year and i love it! I hope to one day get a good handle on the terminal interface but the GUI is awesome and all my hardware was supported. I'm now using it on one of my machines at work.Here at we are relying more heavily on Linux for server use. Ubuntu 8 is a nice gentle push into the world of linux.