Researcher: Apple antivirus advice 'big to-do about nothing'
Apple recent recommendation that Mac users consider running antivirus software was seen by some as a change of heart by the computer maker, but one security researcher argued that the attention given the terse Apple support document is much ado about next to nothing.
View full article »
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













And now we see the downside of the move to Intel.
Part of what kept Macs near-virus-free for decades was that they used CPUs (first Motorola 680x0s, later Motorola and IBM PowerPCs) that fewer wannabe hackers knew how to program on the machine-language level. And with their smaller market share, the effort needed to learn a new CPU architecture and machine language was simply not worth it for such hackers.By switching to Intel Cores and Xeons that use the x86 instruction set and architecture, this substantial learning curve has been removed from the equation. A great many more hackers know x86 machine-language programming than know all other CPU architectures and their ML codes combined!
Yes, the move to Intel had its upsides: Motorola and IBM simply weren’t following through with their promises of faster PowerPCs. While Intel had gone through a dark spell of the Pentium 4 (especially the NetBurst architecture version) which was one of the least efficient CPUs ever made by anyone, coming out with the Pentium M (actually a throwback to the Pentium 3 architecture, with the Pentium 4 SSE2 instructions added — in general, a Pentium 4 at a given clock speed would be matched or even beaten by a Pentium M clocked a full gigahertz slower! A 1.4GHz Pentium M roughly matched a 2.4GHz Pentium 4 in actual performance, for instance!) and the Core, Core², and now Core i7 CPUs derived from the Pentium M architecture made all the difference, jumping them well ahead of AMD and even, in many respects, the PowerPC, in terms of actual performance per clock speed.
But Apple should maybe have given more thought to this downside of using a CPU family that nearly every hacker worthy of the name already knew the ins and outs of. Their relative immunity to malware was one of their biggest selling points, and now it’s greatly weakened.
It used to be true that more new malware came out every day for Windows than had ever existed for the Mac (all the way back to and including the LISA)!
My PC is running like new.
My PC is running like new.I was having trouble with my new computer running slow after I had only had it for a few months. I was upset thinking it was something wrong with my computer until I realized that I needed a good scan to clean out those bugs and viruses that was the real problem. When I started using Search-and-destroy Antispyware it took care of this problem and now my PC is running like new again. The antispyware solution from Search-and-destroy, which you can find at http://www.Search-and-destroy.com, has made a big difference for me and I’m sure you’ll be happy with it too.