Latest pointless Apple rumor: iPhone nano
It gives us something to talk about before the next boring Macworld, right?
View full article »
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













I agree. If the only thing
I agree. If the only thing that changes is size, then the device is completely pointless. The only way that this idea could even take off is if there was some special thing that the iPhone Nano had and the iPhone 3G didn't, or vice versa. Personally, I'm happy with the iPhone's current size. Typing on a device that small would be painful.The Keyword here
The Keyword here is rumors although I'm not a Mac fan and haven't been in years due to price and Apples refusal to License to any other Manufacturer to build or use their OS, but the iPhone in its current state creates enough issues with readability any smaller is unusable. Rumors, take with a grain of salt and throw in the trash. And by the way Blackberry isn't any better in this department.