August 13, 2012, 12:15 PM — Making the business case for an accounting or HR system is clear-cut: Avoid unnecessary costs, manage cash better, reduce risk and you're done. If you were to invest twice as much in one of those systems, you might increase business payoff by 20 percent, so you can find the optimization point for ROI in a single spreadsheet.
With a manufacturing systems, the extra payoff from investing in all the fanciest supply-chain add-ons, such as constraint-based production scheduling and inventory optimization, just isn't there for most businesses. For both the CIO and the CFO, these systems are easy to think about--the data is hard to debate, and the outcomes are pretty much black and white.
Then there's the CRM system. To misquote Tom Lehrer, "Life is like a CRM system: What you get out of it depends on what you put into it."
Depending on your company's process maturity, competitive situation, channel structure and a few other key variables, the same investment can yield wildly different payoffs. There are four main reasons for this difference.
1. CRM Business Processes Are Driven by Humans
Those business processes typically involve huge cost structures, too--in many companies, sales and marketing are the biggest overall expenses. The core business process, revenue generation, is the most unreliable part of most businesses. If you don't believe me, just look at all the "revenue misses" and "upside surprises" in recent earnings reports from Sony, Sharp, Zynga, Facebook and others.
A small difference in the performance of the sales and marketing business processes, then, can make a big difference in your company's bottom line. For example, if you could improve the win rate of your sales team by just 5 percent, you could easily see a 10-percent increase in profitability. It would be difficult to drive that kind of profit increase in the manufacturing business process, not to mention impossible in the accounting business process.
2. CRM Systems Are Still Evolving Rapidly