What's really the safest Web Browser?

By sjvn  12 comments

It's hard to believe that people will actually believe the new NSS Labs report that claims Internet Explorer is safer than other Web browsers at blocking "Socially Engineered Malware" (PDF Link), but I have to remind myself of two things. One, not everyone reads the fine print, which reveals that Microsoft paid for this report. And, two, not everyone is an IT professional who follows this stuff for a living.

So, let's get to it. Is IE (Internet Explorer) safer than the other browsers. Ah, in a word, no.

Internet Explorer 6, which according to the W3school Web browser survey, is still used by over 14% of all Web users is the least safe browser out there. How bad is it? There's a group encouraging Web sites to tell you to dump IE 6. Heck, even Microsoft wants you to get rid of IE6 in favor of IE 7 or IE 8.

IE 7 and, especially, IE 8 are better, but they're not, as claimed by Microsoft, oh excuse me, NSS Labs, safer than your other browser choices. IE fails even at the particular problem of social engineered malware-links that this study is about.

For example, Koobface, perhaps the most common live example of this kind of malware used infected Windows Twitter, Facebook and MySpace accounts to collect your friends name and contact informration. It then sends them links to a fake YouTube site. Once there, it will tell them they need to update their Adobe Flash player before they can view the cideo. If they do, they'll end up with a case of Koobface and the whole process starts over again.

And, who, may I ask, do you think gets the most cases of Koobface? That would be, as Dancho Danchev, independent security consultant, points out, Internet Explorer users. Or, to break it down, IE 7: 43.33%; IE 8: 32.07% and IE 6 13.01%. Oh yeah, with numbers like this I believe that IE is safe. Not.

So what about your other choices? Opera used to be pretty good, but their upcoming version, Opera Unite looks like a security disaster to me.

Apple's Safari, which is available for both Windows and Macs these days, has a long, bad history of fixing security problems slowly. I'd skip Safari for now.

To me, if you want to wander the Web relatively safely, it's a toss up between Firefox 3.5x and Google Chrome . Even with these though you must, must keep them up-to-date. As I've said before and I'll say many times again, security is a process (http://www.itworld.com/security/74446/security-process), not a product.

Of these two, Firefox 3.5 is the more mature of the two and it has a whole family of useful programs that go with it. On the other hand, Chrome is just faster than fast. Chrome burned up the track on my test PCs when I first looked at it, and it's only got better since then.

I see it as a toss-up. If you like a lot of add-ons and extras for your Web-browsing, you want Firefox. If you just want the basics and speed and more speed, Chrome is the browser for you. In either case, you'll be a lot safer than with any of the current competition.

12 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Konqueror is the safest browser. Anyone heard of ANY malware directed at it ? :-)Coming from a perspective that simplicity results in best security I'd put the Arora browser high on the list.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Most people tend to forget that number of IE browser vs. ANYTHING can never be completely justified.IE is installed by default, all the others take a concious effort to install and use.AND... Ie. security issues can be lumped into this skewed way of looking at things.....the 14% of browsers still on IE6 (mentioned in the article) means there are 14% of browsers on machines that probably have not been properly updated or virus protection on them.If a machine has anything other than IE on it, it probably has sufficient Virus proteciton, Malware/Spyware Protection, etc... as the users are more aware of how the internet works...So the raw data actually means nothing until you factor in the owners of these PC's into the mix...
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I haven't used Chrome enough to be sure but so far it looks to be pretty secure. Though there are Google tracking features added that are a concern they really shouldn't have much to do with security. Putting aside Firefox for a bit for two gaping exploit bugs in the past year.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    According to my information and http://secunia.com/ Opera is fast at closing security holes. And I don´t attempt to slow down by Opera 10.To look for security holes, search at the following link:http://secunia.com/advisories/search/
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    It doesnt render pages properly. I want my browser to show me what the websites actually look like. Google Chrome does NOT do that.Google needs to go back to the drawing board because Chrome doesnt work yet. Period.
    sjvn
    sjvn 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    I've yet to find a page--except for those sad IE6 optimized pages that fail for everyone not running IE6--that Chrome can't render. Your viewage may vary.Steven
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Social engineering attacks have nothing to do with the security of the browser. I would venture to say that IE's market share and number of attacks come from the same source: technically inept users - you know, the ones who think the big blue E is the internet and they can just click on anything in sight.
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    Maybe. But I noticed that if you add up those IE 6, 7 and 8 percentages for Koobface, it adds up to 88%+, which is higher than IE's market share by quite a bit. So apparently Firefox isn't taking its full share of infections.Of course, I'm not clear where those numbers come from.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    ...and Chrome is a secure browser? Only if you're the NSASee http://blogs.computerworld.com/chrome_googles_biggest_threat_to_your_privacyand http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8041/
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    So, if I don't run Opera Unite, Opera is still not a safe browser? Unite has to be enabled (it is not by default). You don't know that it's a security disaster but you say 'it looks like one' which it might be but you don't know.I'd have to say this might be a crappy, un-researched article that should be ignored but I don't know.
    sjvn
    sjvn 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    is the next generation of Opera. So, yes, I can't recommend Opera. Their developers seem far more interested in features than security. That's a Bad sign.Steven

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question