Becoming green or just greenish?
OK, OK. I know you're working on becoming "green" or you're at least thinking you'd better have a good story when the CEO decides he wants to mount the environmentally conscious hobby horse so he can ride it to the next shareholders meeting, but wait! What does being green really mean?
[ Podcast: Don't get green scammed ]
It seems that many people in the IT world (and the business world in general) treat being green as a pain in the butt rather than a serious responsibility. Just consider this sentence from an industry publication: "Going green doesn't have to be just an exercise in tree hugging. It can have a positive effect on your company's budget, too."
The reference to "tree hugging" is shorthand for something along the lines of "Things that crazy hippies who enjoy drum circles do," while the conclusion about being good for your budget reduces the concept to, at best, basic self-interest. In other words, the sentiment is that being green is something that comes as a result of dropping a deep knee bend to mammon.
While there are indeed potential cost savings that can come from making environmental concerns part of your IT strategy, there's the bigger issue of doing so because it is the right thing to do.
Now, there's no doubt doing "the right thing" was traditionally a concept at odds with the focus of most corporations. Corporations, in general, and particularly where very large organizations are concerned, exist primarily to make profit as their first, second, and third priorities. This means most social and cultural values are distant runners-up in the list of things corporations are concerned about.
What's starting to change this attitude towards "greening" is evolving public sentiment and governmental pressure, and only the most arrogant corporations are willing to ignore the obvious social demand to be proactive about environmental responsibilities.
But that's the problem: Much of what I'm seeing is just for the appearance of doing something -- a program here, a program there. You might argue that is better than nothing and, to some extent you may be right, but here's my concern: the consequences. If, for example, you virtualize servers to save power but then go and buy PCs that aren't designed to be recycled, that's not really being green. It's that lack of analysis that's the problem.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
environment
Powered by Twitter
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.












