Disk or tape? How about both

By , Network World |  Storage, Backup & Recovery, disk storage

Enterprises today have many more backup choices than they used to have, and they're taking advantage by pairing legacy technologies such as tape with newer disk-based data protection options. Depending on budget, performance and availability requirements, enterprises can mix and match different techniques to meet their disaster recovery objectives.

Six years ago, 63% of enterprises relied exclusively on tape backups, according to Dave Russell, research vice president at Gartner. Today, just 13% of enterprises back up directly to tape -- without any disk -- while 65% have adopted a disk-to-disk-to-tape approach, whereby they back up to disk first and then write to tape.

This trend toward a multi-tiered backup infrastructure is expected to remain strong. More than 50% of midsize organizations and more than 75% of large enterprises will implement tiered recovery architectures by 2013, Gartner predicts.

IN DEPTH: Will cloud backup services finally put tape backups in the trash can?

Engineering firm Strand Associates has added disk-based backup and recovery tools to its arsenal while moving away from - but not entirely abandoning - tape backups. The combination enables greater backup reliability and much speedier recovery times and has freed the IT team from hours of weekly backup administration tasks.

The Madison, Wisc.-based firm used to do daily tape backups at each of its 11 U.S. offices, where local admins or engineers were responsible for manually performing the backups. There were frequent problems, including failed hardware, lost tapes, accidental overwrites and missed backups, recalls Justin Bell, network engineer at Strand Associates.

Today the firm relies on hourly disk-based snapshots, combined with replication for electronically vaulting offsite data copies and, as a final line of defense, weekly backups to tape.

"The primary driver was looking at the amount of time it would take for us to recover from an incident and how far back we would have to go, how much data we would lose from an incident," Bell says of the decision to upgrade to disk-based backup technologies.

Strand Associates is using FalconStor Software's continuous data protection (CDP) technology. A FalconStor CDP device in each office handles local backup, as well as retains 18 months worth of historical snapshots for that office. "It's replicated all the time, so it's up-to-the-second current with what's on the server. If there were a localized disaster, such as a server dies, we could restore off that pretty easily," Bell says.


Originally published on Network World |  Click here to read the original story.
Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Answers - Powered by ITworld

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Ask a Question
randomness