Can Intel save the Ultrabook?

By Colin Neagle, Network World |  Hardware, CES, Intel

LAS VEGAS -- Ultrabooks made a big splash at last year's CES, but sales over the course of 2012 were disappointing. Intel yesterday made a determined bid to change all that.

Craig Stice, an analyst at HIS iSuppli, said one reason Ultrabooks didn't gain much traction was the $1,000 price tag. At a CES press conference yesterday, Kirk Skaugen, general manager of Intel's PC client group, acknowledged this misstep, announcing that the company's manufacturing partners will soon roll out "dozens of platforms [priced] below $750," including touch-enabled devices for $599.

IN PICTURES: The best of CES 2013

MORE: Ultra-hyped ultrabooks ultra-flopped in 2012

In his analysis of what went wrong with Ultrabooks, Stice added that Intel never made clear to consumers exactly what an Ultrabook was or why it was better than a notebook or tablet.

Intel's Skaugen announced that the second-generation Ultrabooks would feature touchscreens and a convertible form factor, in addition to longer batter life.

Intel executives showed off a handful of convertible notebook/tablet Ultrabooks, including the Lenovo Yoga 11s, whose screen can be folded all the way around to take the traditional notebook, tablet, and tent-style form factors, and the Acer Aspire, whose screen can be detached from its keyboard to act as a 10-millimeter-thin Windows 8 tablet.

In terms of battery life, Intel delivered in this category, announcing that new, lower-power, third-generation processors shipping today will drop to 7 watts of power consumption. The previous generation consumed 15W, and many had expected the upcoming Haswell processor (which Skaugen said will launch within the next few months) to consume around 10W.

Skaugen showed a concept platform called Northscape that, even at 17 mm thin, boasted 13-hour battery life. The update is the largest increase in battery life Intel has ever made between two generations of the same processor, Skaugen said.

Much still needs to be done for Intel to climb out of the hole it dug itself into last year. Stice says marketing and advertising were particularly weak last year, for example. How Intel and its manufacturing partners handle that from here on out remains to be seen.

Originally published on Network World |  Click here to read the original story.
Join us:






Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Ask a Question