Intel shrinks Nehalem packages with Jasper Forest

Be the first to comment | 8I like it!
September 14, 2009, 12:02 AM —  IDG News Service — 

Intel on Monday said it had starting sampling Nehalem-based chips code-named Jasper Forest, reaching a milestone in its effort to create smaller and power-efficient chip packages.

Jasper Forest is the first time Intel has integrated the I/O hub directly inside a processor, eliminating the need for a separate I/O controller, said Steve Smith, vice president digital enterprise group operations at Intel.

The integration helps reduce the power drawn by a system while saving space on a motherboard, Smith said. In one test, Intel took a quad-core Xeon chip based on the Nehalem microarchitecture into which it integrated the I/O hub and netted 27 watts of power savings.

"We have removed a fairly large-footprint chip and saved power by integrated [the I/O hub] on to a single chip," Smith said. The chips will provide similar performance to existing Nehalem-based Intel Xeon processors, but be more power efficient, Smith said.

This is one more step in the company's efforts to integrate more features into the CPU, Smith said. Intel has already integrated the graphics processor with a CPU in a single package, and it hopes to pull in more components.

The I/O hub is an interface that connects different components on a motherboard. The I/O hub found in the Xeon chip supports PCI Express, which is commonly used in PCs.

The Jasper Forest chips will come in single-core, dual-core and quad-core variants designed for the embedded, communications and storage equipment markets. The chips could appear in systems starting in early 2010.

Smith declined to name customers to which Intel has sent the chips for sampling.

IDG News Service

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

Intel

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace