VMware ties disaster recovery to vSphere, lifting obstacle to adoption

By Jon Brodkin, Network World |  Virtualization, VMware, vSphere Add a new comment

VMware’s Site Recovery Manager is now supporting vSphere, eliminating one of the obstacles preventing customers from upgrading to the latest version of VMware’s virtualization platform.

vSphere 4, the successor to ESX Server 3.5, was unveiled in April but until now did not work with Site Recovery Manager, VMware’s software for recovering virtual machines in case of disaster.

VMware on Monday released SRM version 4, with support for vSphere and other upgrades including a “many-to-one failover [that] protects multiple production sites with automated failover into a single, shared recovery site.”

Because Site Recovery Manager did not immediately support vSphere, numerous customers have delayed upgrades from 3.5, acknowledges Jon Bock, product marketing manager for VMware’s server business unit. Now that SRM supports vSphere, adoption should accelerate, he said.

“vSphere was a significant change that we had to update the add-on products for. In a perfect world, we’d love to have all the new releases of products released on the same day as the platform,” Bock said. But the months-long delay is similar to delays often seen between the release of a new operating system and add-on products, he said.

“A customer who has important production applications on ESX 3.5 is probably not going to upgrade to vSphere 4 the day after it’s released,” Bock said.

vSphere is still not supported by VMware View, the vendor’s desktop virtualization software. VMware View will be compatible with vSphere in its next release, expected in 2010, according to a VMware spokeswoman. Lifecycle Manager just gained compatibility with vSphere in a new release a few weeks ago.

In addition to support for vSphere, Site Recovery Manager now supports NFS storage, along with Fibre Channel and iSCSI, which were already supported.

“We have a lot of interest in NFS from customers looking at using that in important applications,” Bock says.

SRM works by integrating tightly with storage array-based replication. VMware provides an integration module to partners, and most of the major storage companies have made their products compatible with Site Recovery Manager.

Shared recovery sites, the other new feature, could be useful for companies with multiple branch offices, Bock said. Overall, the new release is “focused on expanding the use cases for Site Recovery Manager,” he said.

The new version of SRM is available now and costs $1,750 per processor. SRM was first released in June 2008 and has been purchased by more than 2,000 customers, Bock says. That’s still a small portion of VMware’s 150,000 customers overall.

Virtualization offers inherent advantages when it comes to disaster recovery, since it eliminates the need to recover the actual physical server an application was running on, Bock notes. Some customers have been using SRM not for disaster recovery but to move applications from one site to another when they are switching data centers, he said. Still, disaster recovery is the main purpose for the software.

SRM support for vSphere was a highly anticipated feature, says ITIC analyst Laura DiDio. “Disaster recovery and backup are in every customer’s top five checklist of things you must have,” she says.

Follow Jon Brodkin on Twitter

    Add a comment

    Post a comment using one of these accounts
    Or join now
    At least 6 characters

    Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
    Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
    The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

    ITworld LIVE

    VirtualizationWhite Papers & Webcasts

    White Paper

    AppAssure vs Backup Exec

    In this new Lab Report, openBench Labs examines AppAssure backup and replication software v4.7 with Symantec Backup Exec 2010 R2. AppAssure implements changed-block tracking technology to provide data protection for both virtual and physical servers in specific OS environments. In contrast, Backup Exec 2010 R2 uses traditional file-based backup to promote compatibility with the largest number of operating systems.

    White Paper

    Top 5 Requirements for Backup of Virtual and Physical Servers - Greg Shields, Microsoft MVP

    Reports by leading industry analysts like Gartner, IDC and Concentrated Technology suggest virtual servers in 2011 will eclipse physical servers in total server deployments. The majority of today's business computing environments already have both virtual and physical servers at the same time.

    White Paper

    Lab Report - Optimizing VM Backup for VMware and Hyper-V

    Data centers are becoming more difficult to manage and protect as more data and applications are moved into virtual environments. Adding fuel to the fire, CIOs must now deal with corporate mandates to build an IT infrastructure that scales to unknown demand levels and provides service assurance for fluctuating conditions that cannot be accurately projected. The solution is a transition to a private cloud characterized by a hypervisor-independent Virtual Infrastructure (VI).

    Webcast On Demand

    Managing Enterprise Mobility Costs

    Mobile employees, especially those traveling internationally, were spending time and resources finding and making connections. Roaming costs were out of control. The IT Administrator at The Hay Group tells you how he got more control over these costs, providing management with predictable budgets and insights while ensuring employee productivity.

    Sponsor: iPass

    White Paper

    Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) Case Study - Oracle

    In this paper, Forrester Consulting examines the total economic impact and potential return on investment (ROI) realized by three Enterprise organizations as they virtualized mission-critical Oracle databases on the VMware vSphere platform. The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of VMware vSphere on their organizations.

    See more White Papers | Webcasts

    Ask a question

    Ask a Question