Review: Acer Aspire Z5600-U1352's Upgrades Disappoint

Despite a roomier hard drive and extra cores, the Z5600-U1352 does little to stand apart from Acer’s Aspire Z5610 all-in-one

By David Murphy, PC World |  Hardware, Acer, desktop PC Add a new comment

When we last left the Acer Aspire Z5610, this all-in-one system was suffering from the dreaded "really good-but-not-great" designation. General speeds were excellent, but the system's other omissions--including a less-than-appealing 320GB of storage and no upgrading--added some scuffs to what would otherwise have been a picture-perfect desktop device. Acer's Aspire Z5600-U1352 ($999, as of February 22, 2010) is in many ways a successor to the Z5610. But just how far does this system go to fix the minor problems of its predecessor?

Although its 2.33GHz processor is clocked at a lower frequency than the Z5610's 2.66GHz Intel dual-core E530, Acer has jumped into quad-core territory with the Z5600's Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200S CPU. The same 4GB of DDR3 memory permeate both systems. It's also great to see the Z5600 fix one of our chief criticisms of the Z5610--storage capacity--with the inclusion of a terabyte hard drive.

The Z5600 hits a score of 98 on PCWorld's WorldBench 6 testing suite. That's mere points away from the Z5610's score of 101, making the two systems virtually identical in general performance. For comparison, the Sony Vaio L117FX/B scored 105, while the Apple iMac 27-inch Core i7 and Apple iMac 27-inch Core i5 scored 128 and 123, respectively. These models all cost close to twice as much as the Z5600, however.

Neither Acer system supports next-generation gaming very well--the Z5610's integrated ATI Radeon HD 4570 graphics wouldn't even run PC World's Unreal Tournament 3 benchmark at its standard setting of 2560-by-2100 resolution, high quality. The Z5600 and its integrated Intel GMA X4500HD setup squeaks out a whopping 4.6 frames-per-second on this benchmark. When you dial back the systems' resolutions, however, the Z5610 emerges as the superior platform.

Part of the Z5610's strength came from its stellar touchscreen display. The Z5600's 23-inch display matches the beautiful look of its predecessor with strong saturation, which gives images and movies an excellent, lifelike representation. The beauty's also in the details: This system's contrasts do much to highlight bits of scenes that would otherwise be obscured or muddled in a less impressive display.

You won't find this kind of detail on the system's external connections, as Acer continues to deliver the same ho-hum loadout on the Z5600 as what's found on the Z5610. The system's rear hosts four USB ports, a gigabit ethernet port (and included wireless-N connectivity), an eSATA port, and integrated 5.1 surround sound. Only two USB ports and a single multiformat card reader can be found on the Z5610's side. Where are the next-generation display connectors? Where are the optical inputs for improved integration into an entertainment setup? These are all questions Acer should have asked itself between desktop revisions.

The Z5600 is more of a minor revision--a selection of a radio box or two on a Web form--than a completely new experience. Mouse? Same. Keyboard? Same. They're good devices, wireless and full of extra functions (for the keyboard, at least), but no different than what was seen on the Z5610.

Input devices are just a few of the many improvements Acer could have made between its Z5600 and Z5610 all-in-ones. The Z5600's chief selling points are its quad-core processor and increased capacity. That's it. The former doesn't make a bit of difference on the general benchmarks (unless you're nitpicking its minor decrease), and the latter is a great upgrade for the $100 price difference between the two systems. But, really, that's it. The Z5600 is a little more "really good," but it would be nice to see Acer take a few additional steps toward all-in-one greatness.


Originally published on PC World |  Click here to read the original story.

ITworld LIVE

HardwareWhite Papers & Webcasts

White Paper

Deliver Cost-Effective Business Continuity with Extreme Capacity

IBM DB2 provides application cluster transparency technology that equips organizations running OLTP applications with the ability to deliver high availability and continuous uptime for transactional data, plus the flexibility and capacity they need to remain competitive.

White Paper

Expert Tips for Consolidating Servers & Avoiding Sprawl

The combined computing demands of VMs can tax even the most powerful server. Cost-effectiveness doesn't mean excessive consolidation; rather, it means balancing workloads between multiple servers. This expert FAQ guide will help you to decide which servers and applications are candidates for virtualization.

White Paper

Expert Guide to Secure Your Active Directory

Layered security is the way to go when it comes to protecting Active Directory. This expert e-guide explains the best method to use when planning and designing a security solution. Find out why it is important to secure Group Policy settings and discover how managed service accounts boost server security in R2.

White Paper

Windows Server 2008 R2 Learning Guide

This expert e-guide uncovers the most common questions that have surfaced with Windows Server 2008 R2. Learn details about this Microsoft operating system and discover the direct cost saving benefits IT departments can experience when making the switch.

White Paper

Best Practices to Achieve Optimal Memory Allocation and Remote Desktop User Experience

Many virtual machines don't fully utilize their available RAM, just like they don't fully utilize their available processors. But Dynamic Memory enables you to shuffle the deck and move some of that RAM around to go where it's needed for better consolidation and efficiency.

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Ask a question

Ask a Question