Why China has more to lose than Google
It's true. Google leaving China harms both. But it hurts the Chinese government more than Google. Here's why.
The Associated Press pointed out the obvious today in a piece headlined "China without Google: 'a lose-lose scenario'."
The piece says losing permission to operate in China means Google won't be able to take Street View pictures, and its partnerships with cell phone companies and others would suffer. There are both direct and indirect downsides to Google.
But I think the downsides are far greater for the Chinese government.
Governments have long been forced to choose between authoritarianism and wealth. Authoritarian countries were poor. Capitalist democracies were rich.
Since the 1980s, China has tried to have it both ways: Suppress and control the people like a two-bit, third rate authoritarian government in the same category as, say, Burma or Cuba, but get rich on the spoils of capitalism like, say, the UK or Japan.
China has been getting away with it. The reason is above all its enormous population. Access to Chinese markets makes foreign multinationals and governments alike go all wobbly at the knees with greed. There's so much money to be made. Why allow little annoyances like the systematic trampling of human rights get in the way of making money?
And then Google comes along. Like other foreign companies trying to do business in China, Google has been violated in multiple ways -- hacked, stolen from, bullied, treated unfairly compared with Chinese competitors, and so on.
Like most companies, Google was willing to tolerate this in exchange for the money. However, Google is different from other companies in two ways.
First, its source code -- and the algorithms that govern page rank -- are the search business. When those were stolen by hackers (likely on behalf of Bidu, its chief Chinese competitor or the Chinese government or both), it was equivalent to Intel's next-generation chip designs being stolen by AMD, or KFC's secret recipe being stolen by Popeye's Chicken.
Second, nearly all Google's services can be delivered remotely, without a physical presence within China.
That combination prompted Google to threaten an abandonment of China, which looks increasingly likely.
Google doesn't want to leave China. And China doesn't want Google to leave. But Google wants to operate securely, and without censoring free speech for the Chinese Communist Party. And China wants Google to serve as an enabler of its authoritarian suppression.
The downside of a China departure for Google means potentially earning a few billion less in annual profits. The company will still earn dozens of billions each year, grow rapidly and continue to dominate the industry -- not to mention increasingly encroach on all our lives, and become indispensible to billions of people around the world.
But the threat to the Chinese Communist Party-dominated political system is existential.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @ITworld
Brian Proffitt
openSUSE: Not for sale today
pasmith
Two new sources fuel the Verizon iPhone rumor mill
sjvn
The Corporation has gone Open Source
Mike Elgan
What to do with your Google 'Social Circle'
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Unix How To: Give me that old-time security!
Dan Tynan
What's worse than privacy legislation? No privacy legislation

The IFA consumer electronics exhibition turns 50
Albert Einstein opened the 7th Great German Radio and Phonograph Show, the forerunner to today's IFA, in Berlin in 1930. The show marked the public debut of a prototype 'television receiver.' Since then, some products, like the 3DTV, were ahead of their time. Others, like the MiniDisc...well, just never got off the ground. Here's a look at IFA's storied past.
IFA 2010
Video: Samsung launches Galaxy Tab
3D content is king at giant tech show
Video: PlayStation 3 will be ready for 3D by October
Video: Sony announces music service, hints at TV service
Google's Schmidt to speak at Berlin show
3D, tablets galore expected at consumer electronics show





It's called YY post in chinese.
Means something you really couldn't do but you are still imagining doing it to make yourself feels better.Why China has more to lose than Google
Hi MikeCouldn't agree with you more, after spending the last six years in China. Your perspective to say the least hits the nail on the head.
Stephen
The Nomadic Romantic English Gentleman
Blind Men and Elephant
If you have not lived in poverty, if you have not experienced life in China's 60s, 70s and even 80s, if you looked China in the eyes of west, you will be wrong again and the same goes to Google.The first time I was in US in 1984, Americans laughed at people driving Japanese Cars, and a lot of products were made in Japan. Now what? Authoritarian or not, if you compared with the performance of the government and changing of living standard in people, Chinese government is number one. If you looked at the mess in Iraq and suffer of its people, you would find no one that support the change of regime at the expense of their lives. If think the Chinese are under suppression, think of those people suffered because of the political decisions from these democratic governments and the financial crises they brought to the world? I lived in UK and Canada for 12yrs and tired of the inefficiencies of the government and waste of our tax payers dollars, and maneuver of political precess and procedures. When you do not know and have only your views, the comparisons you made are wrong at the beginning. Wait and see, the result is either google will make concession or it will lose to its competitors.