Why Twitter is better than Google for real-time results

By Mike Elgan  5 comments

Google announced today the addition of a timeline feature to its Twitter search results.

Google says the timeline lets you "zoom to any point in time and 'replay' what people were saying publicly about a topic on Twitter."

(To try this feature, go to the main Google page, enter your search query and hit the Search button. Click "Show options," then "Updates.")

Nice! Searching for old tweets on Twitter itself is a pain in the neck. You have to slog back in time, one page at a time. The idea of using a slider to dial in a specific time in the past and "see what people were saying" is compelling.

What Google isn't telling you is that their results are just a small subset of the actual tweets posted.

To test this, I searched for the phrase "Everybody Loves Hugo," which was the title of last night's episode of "Lost." I used quote marks.

I found that Google displays at most half the tweets. The other half are ignored or eliminated. Google doesn't say what their criteria are for displaying some tweets and ignoring others.

The bottom line is that if you want a timeline feature to find out what people were saying in the past -- or, if you want partial Twitter results displayed along with messages from MySpace, Facebook and Buzz, Google's "Updates" view is the way to go.

But if you want real-time Twitter updates, Twitter.com itself is far superior to Google. It updates faster, and best of all provides complete results. And if you want even more control, try Twitterfall.com, which lets you eliminate re-tweets, set the speed and generally control a huge number of variables.

5 comments

    Just Outsourcing
    Just Outsourcing 50 weeks ago
    Which reminds me, I need a good Twitter recorder. Any suggestions? I miss a lot of tweets hanging out on blogs like this one!
    Just Outsourcing
    Just Outsourcing 50 weeks ago
    In an attempt to keep up with neck-breaking news, using Twitter is a no-brainer. But my reason for loving Twitter (period) is its 140 character limit: it forces people to get to the point and makes news even faster :-)
    Anonymous 1 year ago
    Some time ago, I really needed to buy a building for my corporation but I didn't earn enough money and couldn't buy anything. Thank God my sister proposed to try to take the loans from reliable creditors. Thence, I did that and was happy with my bank loan.
    Anonymous 1 year ago
    I know twitter an facebook, but unfortunately both of them prohibit and can't displayed in China, each time I need cost much time to connect them by "bridge" to meet my friends. people forcus on us can get all of us abenda
    Anonymous 1 year ago
    Google has a competitive product so although they can no longer ignore Twitter, they undermine it efficiency pretending to co opt them

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      InternetWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Smarter Commerce is redefining value chain visibility

      Smarter Commerce is redefining the value chain in the age of the customer. It starts with putting the customer at the center of your operations - which of itself is not a new idea - however, truly operationalizing this strategy is not easy.

      White Paper

      IBM Synchronizes its Commerce 2.0 Strategy with 'Smarter Commerce' Initiative

      On March 14, IBM announced "Smarter Commerce", a strategic initiative that addresses the surging market for Commerce 2.0 solutions that take advantage of the convergence of a number of disruptive software and hardware technologies.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question