So, I'm sure by now most of you have taken at least a glance at Google's Chrome right?
I find it intriguing as it calls into question something very dear to my heart, namely the relationship between information and applications. Earlier this year I had the opportunity to wonder about this stuff out loud at XTech 2008. In my talk I expressed the view that web pages - as we know and love them - are really just snapshots into something much more interesting - web applications.
The web started out as pages - information - and slowly but surely the degree of dynamic behaviour behind those pages has increased to the point where the pages have disappeared in many cases. If pointing a browser at a URI causes a web server to run a program that generates a page and then throws away the page, then does the page really exist?
Even if a page really exist but consists of 95% Javascript which, when run, generates what the end-user sees, is it a page really? Isn't it an application in disguise? If you look at it that way, then Google's Chrome is an obvious evolutionary step. The original web was all pages. Pages are just a special case of applications. Therefore, lets move to a web of applications. It is the more general solution. We can do everything we could do before but now can do some much more too. What's not to like?
Call me an old fuddy-duddy but I think we will loose something important on the way. In a world of on-demand, just-in-time page generation, what does a URL really point to - a program or the result of running that program? If I spider and index a bunch of web "pages" that are 95% Javascript, what have I created in the index? An index to the content or an index of the programs that, when run, would generate the content?
Are we heading towards a world where we need a browser to "understand" pages for us because we don't carry Javascript interpreters between our ears? I suspect so. What will this mean for the not-yet-fully-formed-and-already-out-moded concept of a mashup for example? Life was so much simpler when the web was simply revolutionary. It is moving beyond that and I don't have a superlative that fits yet.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.
I think it obvious, we will
I think it obvious, we will learn to repost instead of linking. Reposting to youtube, flickr, nopaste, wikileaks, etc will become the norm. I think it already is.