Professor: Google earns $32-50M from typosquatting sites

October 21, 2008, 08:27 AM —  The Industry Standard — 

Harvard Business School professor Benjamin G. Edelman estimates Google makes between US$32 and $50 million in gross profit each year -- potentially much more -- from placing its AdSense text ads on so-called "typosquatting" sites.

The scam has been around for years. Companies will buy domains like "ccartoonnetwork.com" or "bankkofamerica.com" hoping that users will misspell domain names when entering them in the browser window. Then, when users land on those pages, they click the Google AdSense ads that are on the pages, generating revenue for Google and the company that bought the domain name. The loser, says Edelman, is the company whose trademarks have been infringed.

There's another issue, too. Google offers a special AdSense program targeted specifically at parked domains. Does the AdSense for Domains program make Google responsible for typosquatters and their trademark infringement? That's the question that Vulcan Golf, LLC v. Google Inc. et al is attempting to address. The class-action suit was filed last June, and accuses the search giant and various typosquatting companies of trademark infringement. However, the case is a long way from resolution.

Professor Edelman, who is a participating lawyer for the plaintiff in the class, wrote in the McAfee Security Journal (he is also an advisor for McAfee) that McAfee found 80,000 domains typosquatting on the top 2,000 web sites and notes that several large companies, including Neiman Marcus and Microsoft, have gotten big settlements from typosquatting companies.

In a written statement to The Standard about the lawsuit a Google spokesperson said "we believe that these claims are entirely without basis, and we are vigorously defending ourselves."

» posted by ITworld staff

The Industry Standard

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

google

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace