Networking glitch knocks Yahoo offline for some
A networking problem made Yahoo's Web site unreachable for many users on Wednesday.
The problem, first observed at around 11:40 a.m. Pacific Time, appears to have primarily affected users in the eastern United States and Canada who were trying to reach the www.yahoo.com domain.
Network engineers on the NANOG (North American Network Operators Group) discussion list reported that when they tried to reach www.yahoo.com, they were sent on the Internet's version of a wild goose chase. DNS (Domain Name System) servers redirected traffic to another Yahoo domain, www.wa1.b.yahoo.com, which was not associated with an IP address. In other words, computers trying to find Yahoo's Web site were sent nowhere.
The problem appeared to have been resolved by about 1 p.m. Pacific Time.
Yahoo did not have much to say about the outage. The company confirmed in a statement that it had "a disruption in service earlier today that affected users in some geographic areas."
One NANOG poster, apparently a Yahoo employee named Matthew Petach, reported that the problem was triggered by a Juniper T1600 router that "went kablooie."
"This is primarily affecting traffic coming through Ashburn, Virginia," Petach wrote at 1:16 p.m. Pacific Time. "We're aware of the issue and have put workarounds in place; you should be back up and functional for the moment, though not in an optimal state."
The kind of router failure described by Petach could easily have accounted for the problems reported on NANOG Wednesday, if Yahoo's DNS nameservers were behind that faulty router, said Cricket Liu, vice president of architecture with DNS appliance vendor Infoblox.
Yahoo appeared to have fixed the problem by moving some of its DNS services to nameservers run by Akamai, a company that helps sites deliver Web content, Liu said.
"It sounds like maybe they changed ... to Akamai to save their network bacon," he said.
IDG News Service
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
yahoo
Powered by Twitter
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.
Wow, maybe you should get permission first?
I hope the author of this article has been watching NANOG recently, and seen that now NANOG will no longer be talking much about outages due to vulture-like acvities such as Robert McMillan's. Without doing ANY fact checking, McMillan is allowed to report (at best) spurious information about a major network provider (Yahoo) and a major network vendor (Juniper). I realize that McMillan is just trying to make a name for himself, but please, journalistic integrity is something to be cherished, not thrown away so lightly.Patrick
This is hillarious, i've to
This is hillarious, i've to agree with Patrick, this is intended to get some name in media. BTW, research is research.Web Development SEO Web Design SSL Certificate