Motorola denied injunction over standards patents on Microsoft products

Motorola could however be entitled to monetary damages for the standards-essential patents Microsoft allegedly infringed

By , IDG News Service |  IT Management

A District Judge in Seattle denied Motorola Mobility an injunction on Microsoft's products that allegedly infringe its H.264 and 802.11 standards-essential patents.

The order of Judge James L. Robart on Friday applies not only to patents in the suit, but also to H.264 European patents at issue in a lawsuit in Germany between Microsoft and the Google company.

Disputes over standards-essential patents have become common in the U.S. and Europe, and both industry and government bodies have weighed in against letting the patents be grounds for an injunction

As Motorola cannot show irreparable harm or that monetary damages would be inadequate, the court agrees with Microsoft that injunctive relief is improper in this matter, the Judge wrote in an 18-page order.

The order not only dismisses injunctive relief for the Motorola asserted patents, but also for Motorola's entire H.264 standard-essential patent portfolio including the European patents at issue in the lawsuit in Germany, he added.

The lawsuit in Seattle involves two standards-- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers' 802.11 wireless local area network standard and the International Telecommunication Union's H.264 advanced video coding technology standard.

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle had earlier ruled that as a third-party beneficiary of Motorola's commitments to the ITU and the IEEE, Microsoft is entitled to a RAND (reasonable and non-discriminatory) license agreement for Motorola's H.264 and 802.11 standards-essential patents.

"The Motorola Asserted Patents, at issue in this litigation, are standard essential patents of the H.264 Standard and are included in Motorola's H.264 standard essential patent portfolio," Judge Robart wrote in his order. Thus, Microsoft is entitled to a license to the Motorola asserted patents on RAND terms, he added.

Microsoft had filed a motion for partial summary judgment dismissing an injunction sought by Motorola for patent infringement of Motorola-owned H.264 standard-essential patents subject to RAND commitments.

The two companies have disputed before the court the royalty rate, with Microsoft alleging that Motorola seeks to charge too much. The Judge is to decide the royalty rate, thus perhaps laying a framework for resolving similar disputes over royalty for standards patents.

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Ask a Question