Google antitrust probe in U.S. may be wrapping up

A news report says voluntary changes by the Internet search leader may include the scaling down of using restaurant and travel reviews.

By Christina DesMarais, PC World |  IT Management, antitrust, Google

Google may get a chance to voluntarily change some of its advertising and search practices following a two-year antitrust investigation by U.S. regulators.

That's according to Politico, which said in a report that cited anonymous sources that the probe may be coming to a close.

The report said the voluntary changes may include the scaling down of using restaurant and travel reviews from other sites and allowing search advertising campaigns to be easily used on other search engines.

The moves would reportedly allow the Internet search leader to dodge a consent decree that could be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, which has the authority to reprimand companies that violate their own stated policies.

While both the FTC and Google declined to comment on specifics of the case, a Google spokesperson said "We continue to work cooperatively with the Federal Trade Commission and are happy to answer any questions they may have."

Google competitors have claimed the company has an overwhelmingly dominant stake in both online search and online search advertising, which gives it an unfair advantage over rivals in either industry.

In response, Google has maintained that large companies like itself naturally come under scrutiny. But its success is due to innovation and excellent products, "rather than by locking in our users or advertisers, or creating artificial barriers to entry," Google wrote in a blog post in 2010.

More recently, Google's search business practices were defended in a paper by former federal appeals court Judge Robert H. Bork and J. Gregory Sidak, chairman of Criterion Economics.

The authors argued that claims by Google's rivals that its search practices violate antitrust law "contradict real world experiences in search." Those claims, Bork and Sidak contended, "demonstrate [the] competitors' efforts to compete not by investing in efficiency, quality or innovation, but by using antitrust law to punish [a] successful competitor."

The authors maintained that Google's search and ranking algorithms are not unfair in any way but are only part of the company's successful competitive practices.

"Punishing Google for being the most effective search competitor would harm consumers and does contradict the recognized purpose of antitrust law," Bork and Sidak wrote.

Originally published on PC World |  Click here to read the original story.
Join us:






Answers - Powered by ITworld

Ask a Question