Samsung claims Ericsson is demanding billions more for its patent licenses

Ericsson wants a block on Samsung products in the US

By , IDG News Service |  IT Management

Samsung Electronics claims that Ericsson demanded billions more for patent licenses after their license agreement expired in 2007.

The company made its claim in a document filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) on Monday.

Ericsson wants the ITC to ban the import of Samsung's Galaxy S III, Galaxy Note and Galaxy Tab 7.7, as well as other Samsung products including TVs. Ericsson alleged that the products infringe on its patents in a complaint filed with the ITC in December, shortly after it has filed two lawsuits against Samsung in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

Technologies at issue relate to electronic devices for wireless communications and data transfer including radio frequency technology and standardized communication protocols including GSM, GPRS, EDGE, W-CDMA, LTE, and 802.11 Wi-Fi.

Ericsson started the litigation because it wants Samsung to pay licensing fees for patents it has declared essential to implementations of industry standards. Standards bodies usually require that such standards-essential patents (SEPs) be licensed on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. Companies however often disagree about what is a fair and reasonable price for licensing such patents.

In this case, Ericsson decided to start litigation on several fronts in the U.S. because the companies failed to reach a license agreement after two years of negotiations.

According to Ericsson, Samsung was asked to pay the same rate as its competitors, but Samsung refused. Samsung on the other hand said Ericsson demanded significantly higher royalty rates for the same patent portfolio.

"At trial, Samsung is prepared to show Ericsson's offers to license its SEPs after the expiration of the parties 2007 license agreement are unreasonably high -- seeking billions more than the previous license agreements -- and that these offers are inconsistent with FRAND," said Samsung in a document filed with the ITC.

In the same filing, Samsung also notes that the negotiations about the companies' patent portfolios have occurred all over the world and are still ongoing. The dispute is about the appropriate royalty for the parties' respective 2G, 3G, 4G and 802.11 standard essential patent portfolios, Samsung said, adding that it has made cross-license offers based on lump sum royalties and balancing payments.

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

IT ManagementWhite Papers & Webcasts

Webcast On Demand

Enhance Your Virtualization Infrastructure With IBM and Vmware

Sponsor: VMware | IBM

White Paper

Why Projects Fail

White Paper

Why Projects Fail

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Ask a Question