Database admins raise concerns over multiple systems

Company acquisitions are a principal cause of complex architecture

By Antony Savvas, Computerworld UK |  IT Management/Strategy, database, dba Add a new comment

Almost three-quarters (72%) of database administrators have to manage at least two types of database platform, with 14% being forced to manage five different systems, according to research.

Mergers and acquisitions were a major reason for the mixed database environments. Embarcadero Technologies, which provides software tools for database management professionals and application developers, polled over 1,200 DBAs (database administrators), developers, architects and analysts for the research. Most respondents were at firms that employed over 1,000 staff.

Of those surveyed, 20% reported managing one database platform, 33% said they managed two platforms, 25% said three, 8% said four, and 14% said they managed five or more platforms.

Microsoft SQL Server and Oracle were cited as the most common database platforms, with 62% of respondents working with SQL Server and 60% with Oracle. Third on the list was Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise with 35%, and Microsoft Access was fourth with 19%. Oracle was ranked top as the primary database platform respondents worked with.

Exacerbating the multi-platform database situation is that most DBAs are also tasked with managing multiple versions of a database, adding another layer of complexity to their responsibilities, and creating more room for error.

According to the survey, 69% managed more than one version of the same database and, of those that do, 51% said they managed three or more versions of the same database platform.

Mergers and acquisitions are partly to blame for the increase of heterogeneous database environments and the new batch of problems they bring for DBAs.

When asked if their company had gone through a merger or acquisition in the past five years, 43% responded "yes". Of those, 18% reported they had to begin working with new or additional database platforms as a result.

"Each database platform and version has its own features and functionality, and keeping them all straight can be a monumental task for DBAs," said Scott Walz, senior director of product management at Embarcadero. "Multi-platform database management is becoming more commonplace, but that doesn't mean it's getting less complicated."

Whether it is through a company acquisition or a newly introduced application, nearly one-third of respondents expected more database platforms to be introduced into their organisations in the next year.

The complexity of database management is one reason some firms look to outsourcing. DZ Bank in Germany recently outsourced its database management to Atos Origin.


Originally published on Computerworld UK |  Click here to read the original story.

ITworld LIVE

IT Management/StrategyWhite Papers & Webcasts

White Paper

The Cloud: Reinventing Enterprise Collaboration

Collaboration and content sharing are not, of course, new concepts. But cloud computing has changed the nature of collaboration, content sharing, document storage and project management to enable more efficient, faster-acting and cost-effective enterprises. According to a new study by IDG Research, the vast majority of knowledge workers (86%) placed a very high level of importance on collaborating with internal coworkers and external stakeholders, and having access to the most up-to-date corporate information. Read how organizations are realizing massive productivity gains by transitioning their content management solutions to cloud-based models.

White Paper

Empowering Your Mobile Worker

Today's most productive employees are mobile, and your company's IT strategy must be ready to support them with 24/7 access to the business information they need across a range of mobile devices.See how corporations are meeting the many needs of their mobile workers with the help of Box.

White Paper

Market Landscape Report: Online File Sharing and Collaboration in the Enterprise

The trend toward "consumerization" marches onward in IT; more and more end-users are choosing their own hardware plaforms and software applications in lieu of the IT-sanctioned business tools provided by their companies. These end-users are looking to tackle issues like data sharing, portability, and access from multiple intelligent endpoint devices, creating a conundrum for IT as it needs to balance business enablement, ease of access, and collaborative capacity with the need to maintain control and security of information assets. This need for balance is one of the drivers of the fast growing online file sharing and collaboration segment of the SaaS market. This paper examines the market drivers, inhibitors, and top vendors in this segment, including Box, Citrix Sharefile, Dropbox, Egnyte, Nomadesk, Sugarsync, Syncplicity and YouSendIt.

White Paper

Sharing Simplified - Consolidating File-sharing Technologies

Employees need to share content with colleagues within their organization and outside. Yet, ECMs make it hard to share content within a business and impossible between organizations. Read how one company consolidated multiple file sharing technologies to increase productivity and reduce complexity.

White Paper

Content Sharing 2.0: The Road Ahead

A growing number of companies are taking advantage of the natural synergies that exist between cloud-based IT services and content access and sharing. Legacy content management and collaboration systems simply weren't designed to meet the evolving requirements of today's IT and business managers, as well as the needs of content users. Box provides cloud-based content storage, access and collaboration services that require virtually no user training and supports file access and delivery on almost all popular PC and mobile devices. Read how Box let companies rapidly implement a cost-effective and secure content storage and sharing system that can easily expand to accommodate any size and number of files.

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Ask a question

Ask a Question