June 07, 2011, 2:29 PM — So it turns out a certain prominent member of Congress has indeed been shuttling pictures of his somewhat less prominent member across the InterWebs. Who knew?
First, I want to correct an error from my post last week, Anatomy of a Privacy Nightmare. I was obviously wrong when I wrote that the posting of crotch shots across Twitter was probably just a political attack by Anthony Weiner's opponents. Frankly, I didn't think he could be that stupid. Guess I was wrong there, too.
However, I still stand by that post's larger points: An innocent young woman's personal privacy was abused through no fault of her own, and any attempt to “scrub” information from the Internet is like trying to put the toothpaste back into the tube. Once enough of it is out there, there’s really no going back.
[ See also: Beware of Skype voice spam.]
The moral here, as always: Give more thought to what you put out there on the InterWebs before you put it out there (and I'm talking especially to you, Congressman).
As political sex scandals go, I think Weinergate is still not in the same league with, say, soliciting sex in airport bathrooms, or seducing underage Congressional pages, or hiring prostitutes, or knocking up your housekeeper and keeping the love child a secret for a decade, or half a dozen other recent scandals that come to mind. What it is, though, is incredibly, unbelievably, astronomically stupid.
You want to take junk shots and butter them across the InterWebs? I don't have a problem with that, provided the recipient is also a consenting adult who really wants to see how happy Mr. Happy can be. Knock yourself out.
But if you're a publicly elected official who wants to remain a publicly elected official, you might want to think about maybe taking a few precautions. Like: