New offices, legislation seen slowing patent lawsuit rush

The U.S. acting secretary of commerce sees a Silicon Valley patent office providing several benefits to the region's tech industry

By , IDG News Service |  IT Management

A planned network of regional patent offices and the effects of new legislation are expected to slow the recent
proliferation of patent lawsuits between big-name tech companies, Rebecca Blank, U.S. acting secretary of commerce,
said on Wednesday.

In recent months, companies including Apple and Samsung have spent hours in court arguing over patent
infringement in smartphones. The handheld gadgets have generated several big cases, as have issues such as software
patents.

"We clearly have some difficult legal issues right now," Blank told IDG News Service. "The America Invents Act
and some of the things we are doing are going to help that; I'm not sure they are going to fully solve some of
those issues."

Blank was speaking at San Jose State University as part of a daylong trip to Silicon Valley. The visit will see
her meet with local political leaders and executives from some of the region's tech companies. It comes a week
after the Commerce Department said one of four new satellite patent offices will be based in the San Jose metro
area. A precise location has not yet been determined. [See
Blank announcing the Silicon Valley office on YouTube
.]

Putting an office in Silicon Valley is expected to help the Patent Office hire local experts with greater
knowledge of technology, leading to higher-quality patents, she said. [See Blank disclosing additional details of the Silicon Valley office
on YouTube
.]

"Higher-quality patents means less legal challenges. Faster patents [also] often mean less legal challenges,
because often times the longer it takes to get a patent the more other people are encroaching on the space, so
speed and quality are two things I think this legislation and these new offices are going to help us achieve," she
said.

"That will be useful in dealing with some of the legal issues," she continued. "Whether it fully resolves them,
this is [something] we are going to have to keep working on for the foreseeable future."

Last week, a high-profile U.S. appeals court judge, Richard Posner, questioned the need for patents for some
technologies. He recently shot
down
one of the biggest issues in Apple's ongoing battle with Motorola, so his views carry some weight.

"You just have this proliferation of patents. It's a problem," he said in an interview with
Reuters.

Asked to comment on his remarks, Blank said, "There is an evolution on what is patentable and what isn't.
Obviously, that's going to continue."

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Answers - Powered by ITworld

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Ask a Question
randomness